Utah 2024 Regular Session

Utah House Bill HJR003

Introduced
1/16/24  
Refer
1/16/24  
Report Pass
1/24/24  
Engrossed
1/31/24  
Refer
2/21/24  
Report Pass
2/27/24  

Caption

Joint Resolution Regarding Higher Education Accreditation

Impact

The resolution aims to reshape state laws by asserting states' rights over higher education accreditation, which traditionally falls under federal oversight. HJR003 calls for the formation of a working group led by the state's higher education commissioner to explore alternative accreditation options, potentially including a state-led accreditation process. This could lead to significant changes in how Utah institutions are evaluated and accredited, allowing for more localized control and potentially impacting federal funding mechanisms tied to accreditation status.

Summary

HJR003, titled the Joint Resolution Regarding Higher Education Accreditation, proposes that the federal government should return full control over the accreditation processes for public higher education institutions back to the states. This resolution is driven by the belief that education, particularly higher education, should be managed at a state level without federal interference. It highlights the challenge currently faced by Utah, which believes federal oversight limits its autonomy in managing accreditation matters effectively.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HJR003 seems to resonate with a pro-state rights stance, appealing to those who advocate for reduced federal oversight in education. Supporters argue that allowing states to control accreditation will enable tailored educational standards that align with local needs and values. However, there may be concerns among opponents regarding how attainable this goal is without sacrificing access to federal student aid and funding, which is currently contingent on compliance with federal accreditation standards.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential for reduced federal funding if states assume control of accreditation processes and how such changes may affect the quality and recognition of educational programs. Additionally, the resolution raises questions about the financial implications and feasibility of implementing a state-led accreditation system. The discussions surrounding HJR003 will likely involve debates on the balance between ensuring educational standards and the autonomy of state governance.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

UT HJR020

Joint Resolution Regarding Higher Education Accreditation

UT HJR024

Joint Resolution Encouraging Support for the Houses Act

UT HJR023

Joint Resolution Regarding Federal Funds for National Park Reopening

UT HJR008

Joint Resolution for Fertility Preservation Coverage

UT HJR003

Joint Resolution Recognizing School Teachers

UT HJR012

Joint Rules Resolution - Budget Efficiency Modifications

UT HJR001

Joint Resolution Designating National Speech and Debate Education Day

UT HJR002

Joint Resolution Amending Rules of Civil Procedure on Injunctions

UT HB0102

Higher Education Residency Amendments

UT SB0146

Higher Education Governance Amendments

Similar Bills

NC S680

Revise Higher Ed Accreditation Processes

TX SB2647

Relating to the accreditation of postsecondary educational institutions; authorizing fees.

CA SB802

Private postsecondary education: California Private Postsecondary Education Act of 2009.

TX HB4880

Relating to the accreditation of public institutions of higher education; providing a private cause of action.

TX SB2335

Relating to the accreditation of public institutions of higher education.

SC H3476

Higher education accrediting agencies

TX HB1870

Relating to the accreditation of public institutions of higher education.

TX SB1322

Relating to the accreditation of public institutions of higher education.