Race, Ethnicity, Gender And Disability Impact Statement Act
Impact
The provisions of H7736 seek to amend Title 42 of the General Laws, adding a new chapter specifically focused on impact statements. This requirement positions Rhode Island as a leader in transparency and accountability within the legislative process, especially concerning policies that have historically marginalized certain groups. It mandates that bill sponsors provide evidence-based evaluations of how proposed laws could affect equity among demographic groups, which could lead to more informed policy-making and better outcomes for vulnerable populations. The act is expected to foster an environment where the needs of historically disadvantaged groups are better recognized and addressed in policy formulations.
Summary
House Bill 7736, known as the Race, Ethnicity, Gender and Disability Impact Statement Act, aims to establish a formal process for assessing the potential impacts of legislative proposals on underrepresented and disadvantaged communities in Rhode Island. The bill requires that any legislation pertaining to subjects such as health care, education, housing, and criminal justice include a detailed impact statement that considers how these policies may reinforce or mitigate existing disparities based on race, ethnicity, gender, and disability. This initiative is designed to ensure that legislative actions promote equity and do not inadvertently perpetuate inequalities.
Contention
While supporters view the bill as a necessary mechanism to address systemic inequities, there are concerns regarding the administrative burden it imposes on lawmakers and the legislative process. Critics argue that the definitions of 'disadvantage' and the parameters for conducting these impact statements could lead to politicized interpretations and potentially slow down the legislative process. Additionally, there is apprehension that the execution of these impact assessments may not be sufficiently rigorous or objective, raising questions about their effectiveness in truly resolving disparities. The balance between ensuring thorough impact assessments and maintaining legislative efficiency remains a significant topic of debate among stakeholders.
Requires statements as to whether a bill is likely to increase equity, decrease equity or have no impact on equity to be included on up to 20 pieces of legislation.