Wisconsin Senate Bill SB434

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 9/20/23
• Refer: 9/20/23
• Report Pass: 9/28/23
• Engrossed: 10/17/23
• Refer: 11/8/23
• Enrolled: 11/15/23
• Chaptered: 12/7/23
• Passed: 12/7/23

Caption

Repair of complex rehabilitation technology under the Medical Assistance program. (FE)

Impact

The implications of SB434 are significant for both service providers and recipients of Medical Assistance. By removing the requirement for prescriptions and prior authorizations for repairs, the bill is designed to streamline access to essential medical equipment repairs for individuals with disabilities. The intent behind this measure is to ensure that necessary repairs can be conducted promptly without bureaucratic delays that might hinder patient care, ultimately improving the quality of life for those relying on such technology.

Summary

Senate Bill 434 aims to modify current regulations surrounding the repair of complex rehabilitation technology under the Medical Assistance program. The bill seeks to ease the requirements for reimbursement, specifically by prohibiting the Department of Health Services (DHS) from requiring a prescription or prior authorization for the repair of complex rehabilitation technology. This applies as long as the technology was previously prescribed and adequately reimbursed under Medical Assistance conditions. Notably, this change does not extend to cases where individuals using this technology are part of a managed care organization.

Contention

Discussion around SB434 has highlighted the ongoing tension between regulatory efficiency and patient safety. On one side, advocates for the bill argue that removing barriers to repairs is crucial for individuals who need immediate access to functioning medical equipment, thereby reducing potential health risks. On the other side, some stakeholders express concerns about the potential risk of improperly maintained or repaired equipment, especially without the oversight of prescriptions or prior authorizations. This dichotomy reflects broader debates within health policy on how best to balance accessibility with safety and oversight.