Prohibiting the use by the governor of emergency orders concerning elections procedures without the written consent of the majority and minority leaders of the house of representatives and senate.
If enacted, HB 1343 would amend existing laws pertaining to the governor's powers during emergencies, particularly in reference to election procedures. This legislation would require the involvement of the legislature in decisions that previously could have been made unilaterally by the governor under emergency conditions. Proponents of the bill are likely to argue that it safeguards democratic processes by ensuring that elected representatives are involved in significant changes to how elections are conducted, thus enhancing legislative accountability.
House Bill 1343 is a proposed piece of legislation aimed at regulating the authority of the governor regarding emergency orders that modify election procedures. Specifically, the bill stipulates that any changes to New Hampshire's election processes due to a state of emergency must be approved in writing by both the majority and minority leaders of the House of Representatives and the Senate. The bill emphasizes the importance of elections as a fundamental aspect of democracy, suggesting that they should only be altered under strict legislative oversight.
The sentiment around HB 1343 is expected to reflect a divide between those who prioritize electoral integrity and oversight and those who may view the bill as an unnecessary impediment to the governor's ability to act swiftly during emergencies. Supporters may argue that legislative approval is essential for maintaining trust in the electoral process, while opponents might contend that it could delay necessary actions in the face of urgent situations, thus potentially undermining effective governance.
Notable points of contention regarding HB 1343 center around the balance of power between the executive and legislative branches during a crisis. Critics may express concerns that requiring legislative approval for emergency election orders complicates governance and impedes quick responses to unforeseen circumstances. Meanwhile, advocates for the bill may assert that such checks are vital to protect the integrity of elections and prevent potential overreach or abuse of power by state officials.