A civil cause of action for a minor injured by a gender transition procedure.
The bill makes it mandatory for health care providers to follow stringent documentation and therapeutic protocols before administering gender transition procedures, including consistent treatment of the minor's perceived gender over a two-year span. Additionally, it stipulates that at least two health professionals must certify that the procedure is necessary for treating any mental health concerns related to gender dysphoria. This creates an additional layer of legal and medical requirements that could significantly affect the availability and administration of gender transition care for minors, potentially leading to decreased access for those in need. Critics argue that such restrictions could harm minors by delaying or denying appropriate care.
Senate Bill 479 establishes a civil cause of action against health care providers who perform gender transition procedures on individuals under 18 years of age. If a minor experiences injury—be it physical, psychological, emotional, or physiological—as a result of such procedures, they, or their guardians, are entitled to bring a lawsuit against the provider. The bill emphasizes that any legal action must be initiated before the minor reaches the age of 33, creating a significant time frame for claims. This proposal is aimed at holding health care providers accountable for the outcomes of gender transition treatments in minors, which is particularly controversial due to the current discourse on gender issues and youth rights.
There are significant points of contention surrounding Senate Bill 479, particularly regarding the implications for medical autonomy and parental rights. Advocates for the bill argue that it is a necessary measure to prevent potential harm to minors via unproven and potentially damaging medical procedures. However, opponents claim that it undermines the rights of parents and health care providers in making informed decisions about the best course of treatment for youth facing gender dysphoria. The bill's focus on liability could also lead to a chilling effect among providers, who may fear repercussions from legal actions, potentially resulting in a decreased willingness to address or support gender transition for minors.