Missouri Senate Bill SCR25

Missouri 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/11/22
• Refer: 1/13/22
• Engrossed: 4/14/22
• Refer: 4/19/22
• Report Pass: 4/27/22
• Refer: 4/27/22
• Report Pass: 5/2/22
• Enrolled: 5/10/22

Caption

Applies to Congress for the calling of an Article V convention of the states to propose an amendment to the United States Constitution regarding term limits for members of Congress

Impact

The adoption of SCR25 would signify a concerted effort by the State of Missouri to push for federal reforms regarding term limits in Congress. This resolution aligns with ongoing national discussions concerning the professional entrenchment of politicians and potential solutions to perceived legislative stagnation. If multiple states apply for a convention on this matter, it could catalyze a movement that alters the fundamental structure of legislative term limits across the United States.

Summary

Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 25 (SCR25) seeks to apply to Congress for the calling of an Article V convention of states to propose an amendment to the United States Constitution that would establish term limits for members of both the House of Representatives and the Senate. This resolution is rooted in Article V of the Constitution which provides the process for states to request a convention to propose amendments. If successful, this could lead to significant changes in the legislative landscape at the federal level, impacting how future representatives are elected.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SCR25 appears to be largely positive among its supporters, who argue that establishing term limits will combat the issues of career politicians and foster a more dynamic political environment. However, there are concerns from opponents regarding the efficacy of such amendments, fearing that limiting terms might restrict the bench of experienced legislators and hinder legislative continuity.

Contention

Debate surrounding SCR25 likely centers on foundational questions regarding the balance of political power and state versus federal governance. Supporters believe that limiting Congressional terms would invigorate the political process and allow for new ideas and perspectives, while opponents may argue about potential disruptions to the legislative framework. The resolution's passage also raises procedural questions about the mechanics of convening an Article V convention and the implications for state sovereignty versus federal authority.