Washington 2023-2024 Regular Session

Washington Senate Bill SB5836

Introduced
1/8/24  
Refer
1/8/24  
Report Pass
1/11/24  
Refer
1/12/24  
Report Pass
2/1/24  
Engrossed
2/13/24  
Refer
2/15/24  
Report Pass
2/21/24  
Refer
2/21/24  
Report Pass
2/26/24  
Refer
2/26/24  
Enrolled
3/8/24  
Chaptered
3/15/24  

Caption

Adding an additional superior court judge in Clark county.

Impact

The impact of SB5836 on state laws revolves around the organizational structure of the judicial system, particularly in Clark County. By increasing the number of judges, the bill intends to improve judicial responsiveness and facilitate better case management. This change could set a precedent for future judicial appointments or adjustments in other counties facing similar challenges, thereby influencing how judicial resources are allocated statewide.

Summary

SB5836 proposes to add an additional superior court judge in Clark County, likely in response to growing demands on the judicial system in that region. This legislative measure is aimed at enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of the court, ensuring that cases are heard in a timely manner and that the public's access to justice is improved. The addition of a judge is anticipated to alleviate some of the burdens currently faced by the existing judges in Clark County, addressing concerns regarding case backlogs and extended wait times for court proceedings.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB5836 appears to be positive, with strong support from various stakeholders who recognize the importance of a robust judicial system. Advocates argue that this added judicial position will be crucial in meeting the needs of a growing population and ensuring that legal proceedings are conducted without unnecessary delays. However, there may also be some skepticism regarding the funding and operational implications of creating a new judicial position, as resources are always a concern with such measures.

Contention

While SB5836 generally enjoys broad support, some points of contention might arise relating to the financial implications of funding an additional judge. Questions concerning the adequacy of state funding for this position and the potential for increased operational costs could be areas of debate. Additionally, there may be discussions about the criteria for judicial appointments and how the state ensures qualified candidates are selected, which could lead to further scrutiny and examination as the bill progresses.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

WA HB1992

Adding an additional superior court judge in Whatcom county.

WA HB1144

Adding an additional superior court judge in Skagit county.

WA SB5827

Adding an additional superior court judge in Whatcom county.

WA LB799

Change judges' salaries, judgeships in county courts and the Nebraska Workers' Compensation Court, and provisions relating to the Supreme Court and the College of Law

WA LB81

Change number of county judges in Buffalo and Hall counties

WA HB1207

Concerning superior court clerk fees.

WA SB5003

Increasing the number of district court judges in Snohomish county.

WA HB1621

Authorizing superior courts to appoint housing court commissioners.

WA HB2213

Concerning defects and omissions in the laws that have been identified by the justices of the supreme court or judges of the superior courts pursuant to Article IV, section 25 of the state Constitution.

WA HB1893

Concerning the establishment of liability standards for superior, district, and municipal court judges.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.