Michigan House Bill HCR0006

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 10/17/23
• Refer: 10/17/23
• Report Pass: 9/25/24
• Passed: 9/25/24
• Engrossed: 9/25/24

Caption

A concurrent resolution to approve the State Officers Compensation Commission determinations.

Impact

The bill's passage will result in specific financial adjustments for the judicial branch, particularly enhancing the salary structure for the Supreme Court Justices while leaving the remuneration of other state officers unchanged. This legislative action is in accordance with Article IV, Section 12 of the Michigan Constitution and underlines the role of the State Officers Compensation Commission in evaluating and recommending compensation levels for state officials. The ripple effect of this resolution is meant to align judicial compensation with inflationary measures and the demands of the role while avoiding fluctuations in legislative salaries.

Summary

HCR0006 is a concurrent resolution introduced by Representatives Wilson and Filler aimed at approving the determinations made by the State Officers Compensation Commission concerning the salaries and expense allowances for various state officials. The resolution specifically endorses a recommended 7 percent salary increase for the Justices of the Supreme Court for the years 2025 and 2026, alongside an annual expense allowance of $10,000. Notably, it maintains the existing salaries and expense allowances for other state officers, including members of the Legislature, the Governor, and other key officials.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HCR0006 appears to be generally supportive, particularly among lawmakers who recognize the importance of appropriately compensating the judiciary to uphold the integrity and efficacy of the judicial system. However, there may be cautions expressed regarding the financial implications for the state budget without corresponding adjustments for other officials, reflecting a careful balance that legislators must navigate concerning public perception and fiscal responsibility.

Contention

One notable point of contention deals with the disparity of treatment in financial compensation among state officers. While HCR0006 seeks to elevate the salaries of Supreme Court Justices, the decision to leave other elected officials' salaries unchanged could trigger debate about equity and fairness within state governance. As the bill progresses, discussions may arise on the broader implications of how state officers are compensated and the possible effects on recruitment and retention of qualified individuals in these critical roles.