New Hampshire House Bill HB571

New Hampshire 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/11/23
• Refer: 1/11/23
• Refer: 2/22/23
• Report DNP: 11/15/23

Caption

Relative to the cost of living adjustments for certain group II retirees in the New Hampshire retirement system.

Impact

The financial implications of HB571 are significant, with an estimated increase in state expenditures of $84.2 million for the 2023 fiscal year, sourced from the state general fund. The act aims to provide consistent financial support to retirees who have served in critical capacities within state services, ensuring they maintain their purchasing power as inflation and living costs rise. Additionally, this COLA would become a permanent addition to each member's retirement allowance, making it a crucial component of future financial planning for these retirees.

Summary

House Bill 571 (HB571) is a legislative act focused on enhancing the financial support of certain retired members of the New Hampshire retirement system, specifically targeting group II retirees. The bill establishes a cost of living adjustment (COLA) applicable to those retired for a specific duration, creating a framework for supplemental allowances based on the length of retirement. Retirees with between 120 and 239 months of service will receive a 5% adjustment, while those retired for 240 months or more will receive a 10% adjustment on the first $50,000 of their annual retirement allowance. These adjustments are intended to provide financial relief amid rising living costs.

Contention

Discussions surrounding HB571 may raise concerns about the funding mechanisms and the broader fiscal management strategies of the New Hampshire state budget. Some legislators may question the sustainability of such financial commitments, especially considering the fixed nature of state revenues. Additionally, there may be debates regarding equity, with inquiries into how this COLA framework addresses the needs of other groups of retirees or public employees who may not qualify under the specific criteria outlined. The administration of the proposed adjustments might also face scrutiny regarding its implementation and potential administrative costs.