Pennsylvania House Bill HB489

Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/16/23
• Refer: 3/16/23

Caption

In voting by qualified absentee electors, further providing for canvassing of official absentee ballots and mail-in ballots; and, in Election Integrity Grant Program, further providing for funding for elections.

Impact

By amending existing provisions about absentee ballot canvassing, HB 489 is expected to tighten the timeline and procedures that govern how elections are conducted in Pennsylvania. This may lead to quicker results and reduce the likelihood of delays due to unprocessed ballots on election day. Additional funding provisions through the Election Integrity Grant Program are included, which could provide counties with resources necessary to implement these changes effectively.

Summary

House Bill 489 seeks to amend the Pennsylvania Election Code by enhancing the processes surrounding the canvassing of absentee and mail-in ballots. Specifically, it requires county boards of elections to meet for pre-canvassing procedures prior to election day, allowing them to begin this process up to a week before the election. The bill aims to streamline the election process by ensuring that all absentee and mail-in ballots received by a specified deadline are pre-canvassed, thus enhancing the efficiency of ballot counting on election day.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 489 appears to be supportive among legislators advocating for election integrity and efficiency in the electoral process. Advocates emphasize the importance of ensuring that absentee ballots are managed properly to preserve the integrity of elections. However, there may be concerns regarding how these changes could affect voters and the transparency of the canvassing process, indicating a mixed reception depending on the viewpoints of various stakeholders.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB 489 may arise from concerns over the pre-canvassing process and its implications for voter privacy and the overall transparency of elections. Critics may argue that while efficiency is important, the processes must not compromise public trust in the electoral system. The balance between streamlining the election process and ensuring that all electoral integrity measures are respected will likely be a central focus in discussions regarding this bill.