Michigan Senate Bill SB0607

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 10/24/23
• Refer: 10/24/23
• Report Pass: 12/13/24
• Engrossed: 12/13/24
• Refer: 12/13/24

Caption

Administrative procedure: rules; definition of a rule; exclude cleanup criteria and target detection limits. Amends sec. 7 of 1969 PA 306 (MCL 24.207). TIE BAR WITH: SB 0606'23, SB 0605'23

Impact

If passed, SB0607 would have significant implications for how state laws are interpreted and enforced. By narrowing the definitions and exclusions of rules, the bill could enhance government efficiency in implementing healthcare and environmental regulations. The exclusions specified in the bill are particularly important because they could limit the ability of agencies to enforce certain rules that may not fit within the newly defined framework, potentially leading to regulatory gaps. The bill is intended to ensure that the legal interpretations of agency actions align more closely with legislative intent.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 607 aims to amend the Administrative Procedures Act of 1969, specifically targeting section 7 to provide a clearer definition of what constitutes a 'rule.' The bill seeks to delineate types of agency regulations, statements, and policies that implement or apply the law administered by government agencies. Notably, it specifies exclusions from this definition, including resolutions of the state administrative board and certain health-related decisions. These amendments are aimed at streamlining regulatory frameworks and clarifying agency authority regarding rulemaking processes.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB0607 appears to be mixed, reflecting varying opinions on regulatory reform. Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary step in clarifying and modernizing administrative processes, thus increasing transparency and efficiency in government operations. In contrast, critics express concerns that the more restrictive definitions could undermine the state's regulatory authority over critical areas such as healthcare oversight, potentially jeopardizing public safety and well-being.

Contention

Key points of contention regarding SB0607 revolve around its potential impact on regulatory flexibility and public health oversight. Some lawmakers fear that the limitations imposed by the bill could hinder the ability of health agencies to respond effectively to emergencies or adapt regulations to evolving public health needs. Furthermore, the linkage of SB0607 with other proposed legislation (SB0606 and SB0605) raises questions about the comprehensive approach to regulatory reform and whether it adequately addresses the needs of various stakeholders.