Wisconsin Senate Bill SB582

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 10/30/23
• Refer: 10/30/23
• Report Pass: 11/10/23
• Failed: 4/15/24

Caption

Status as an indefinitely confined voter for purposes of automatically receiving absentee ballots and providing a penalty. (FE)

Impact

One of the notable changes introduced by SB582 is the requirement for applicants seeking indefinitely confined status to submit proof of identification alongside their applications. This adds a layer of accountability to the application process but also raises concerns regarding accessibility. While proponents argue that it fortifies the application process, critics fear that it might disenfranchise those without immediate access to identification. The bill also explicitly states that a tracking or previous status of being indefinitely confined during a disease outbreak would not qualify under this provision, which may exclude individuals who might perceive themselves as temporarily unable to travel but not formally classified as indefinitely confined.

Summary

Senate Bill 582 addresses the status of voters who are deemed 'indefinitely confined' due to disability, frailty, or physical illness that significantly impairs their ability to travel. The bill stipulates that these voters may apply for a status that allows them to receive absentee ballots automatically for every election, which seeks to facilitate participation in electoral processes for those unable to vote in person. This measure is particularly significant for individuals whose conditions are expected to last more than a year, thus streamlining the voting process for vulnerable populations.

Contention

Contention surrounding SB582 centers on the implications of requiring proof of identification and the definition of being indefinitely confined. Critics argue that this may lead to an increased burden on individuals who are already facing challenges due to their health. Moreover, the bill includes penalties for providing false information when applying for the indefinitely confined status, which can be seen as a deterrent but also raises fears of potential misuse against vulnerable populations who could be unintentionally caught in regulatory misunderstandings.