Michigan House Bill HB5196

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 10/24/23
• Refer: 10/24/23
• Report Pass: 5/16/24
• Engrossed: 6/25/24
• Refer: 6/26/24

Caption

Insurance: other; civil penalties for violations; allow. Amends sec. 150 of 1956 PA 218 (MCL 500.150).

Impact

If enacted, HB 5196 would have significant implications for the enforcement of insurance regulations in Michigan. By establishing a structured penalty system, the bill aims to enhance compliance among insurance providers. It aims to limit excessive penalties while ensuring that repeat offenders or knowingly noncompliant individuals face more substantial repercussions. The increased regulatory authority of the director is expected to streamline the process of addressing violations and reinforcing the integrity of insurance practices statewide.

Summary

House Bill 5196 aims to amend the 1956 Michigan Insurance Code by adjusting provisions related to civil penalties for violations. It delineates specific fines for noncompliance and offers an opportunity for violators to have a hearing before the director under the state’s administrative procedures act. The bill empowers the director to impose fines, which can vary depending on the individual's knowledge of the violation, and also provides for the suspension or revocation of licenses for grave infractions. This modification is intended to make the regulatory process more effective in maintaining compliance within the insurance sector.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be largely supportive among legislators and stakeholders who prioritize regulatory effectiveness within the insurance industry. Proponents see it as a means to clarify and strengthen compliance mechanisms, arguing it would ultimately protect consumers by promoting a higher standard of accountability. However, there may be concerns expressed by industry groups related to the potential for overreach in regulatory measures, which could complicate operations and result in financial burdens for certain businesses.

Contention

Despite the overall positive reception of HB 5196, points of contention could arise regarding the balance of regulatory power and the potential impact on smaller insurance providers who may struggle with compliance costs or administrative burdens. The stipulations for license suspension and significant fines might be perceived as punitive by some industry players. The debate may, therefore, center on finding the right equilibrium between effective oversight and fair treatment of businesses in the insurance sector.