Pennsylvania House Bill HB672

Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/23/23
• Refer: 3/23/23
• Refer: 3/19/24

Caption

Providing for the disclosure of information by professionals unlicensed by the Commonwealth; imposing duties on the Attorney General; and imposing a penalty.

Impact

The implications of HB 672 on state laws are significant, as it addresses the gap in regulations concerning unlicensed professionals. By establishing clear disclosure requirements, the bill aims to protect consumers from potentially harmful practices and enhance the overall safety and quality of services provided. This legislation could lead to increased scrutiny of individuals operating without proper licensing, thus fostering a more rigorous professional environment across various sectors.

Summary

House Bill 672 introduces measures aimed at enhancing transparency and accountability among professionals who are unlicensed in the Commonwealth. The bill specifically mandates the disclosure of information regarding these professionals, thereby ensuring that potential consumers are informed before engaging in services. Additionally, the bill imposes certain duties on the Attorney General to oversee compliance and enforce penalties for non-compliance, representing a significant shift towards stricter regulation of unlicensed practices.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 672 appears to be generally supportive, particularly among consumer advocacy groups and entities concerned with public safety. Many stakeholders believe that the bill is a necessary step towards preventing fraud and ensuring that consumers have access to accurate information about the professionals they hire. However, there may be some apprehension from unlicensed professionals who feel that the bill could impose undue burdens on their ability to operate freely and offer their services.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB 672 include concerns about the balance between regulation and accessibility. Critics may argue that the additional regulatory requirements could create barriers for certain professionals who are attempting to enter the market. Furthermore, discussions around the enforcement of penalties by the Attorney General might raise questions about resource allocation and the practical implications of ensuring compliance across unregulated professions.