Michigan House Bill HB5299

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 11/3/23
• Refer: 11/3/23

Caption

Natural resources: hunting; feeding or baiting deer; allow. Amends sec. 40111a of 1994 PA 451 (MCL 324.40111a). TIE BAR WITH: HB 5298'23

Impact

The bill aims to standardize practices related to deer and elk feeding, contributing to better wildlife management across Michigan. By instituting a licensing requirement and setting limits on bait usage, the legislation seeks to mitigate risks associated with feeding practices that could facilitate the spread of diseases, such as Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD). Proponents of the bill argue that these changes will help protect the state's natural resources and maintain healthy deer populations, which are crucial for both ecological balance and hunting activities within the state.

Summary

House Bill 5299 proposes amendments to the existing Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act to regulate deer and elk feeding practices in the state of Michigan. The bill addresses the depositing and distribution of feed intended for wild, free-ranging white-tailed deer and elk. It establishes guidelines for individuals wishing to engage in such practices, including requirements for licenses and restrictions on the amount and manner in which feed can be used. The intent is to ensure that these activities do not negatively impact wildlife health and management efforts, particularly regarding the potential spread of infectious diseases among deer populations.

Contention

However, the bill has sparked some contention among stakeholders. Critics may raise concerns regarding restrictions on feeding practices, viewing them as an overreach that could hinder traditional hunting and feeding methods utilized by communities. Some may argue that the proposed regulations could reduce opportunities for recreational viewing and hunting, particularly in rural areas where hunting plays a significant role in local culture and economy. Additionally, there is an ongoing debate about whether such regulations adequately address the core issues of wildlife disease management, or if they simply add a layer of bureaucracy that might not effectively resolve the challenges presented.