Minnesota House Bill HF447

Minnesota 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/17/23
• Refer: 1/17/23
• Report Pass: 4/3/23
• Refer: 4/3/23
• Report Pass: 4/13/23
• Engrossed: 4/27/23
• Refer: 5/1/23
• Report Pass: 5/2/23
• Enrolled: 5/23/23
• Passed: 5/26/23
• Chaptered: 5/26/23

Caption

Legislative enactments; miscellaneous oversights, inconsistencies, ambiguities, unintended results, and technical errors corrected.

Impact

The passage of HF447 introduces amendments to Minnesota statutes, particularly affecting sections related to employment and economic development. Notably, it directs the commissioner of employment and economic development to submit an annual list of required reports to the legislature, ensuring that unnecessary mandates can be reviewed for relevancy and utility. This change could free up resources and time for businesses and government departments by reducing redundant reporting obligations, which could foster a more business-friendly environment.

Summary

House File 447 (HF447) focuses on correcting various legislative enactments, addressing miscellaneous oversights, inconsistencies, ambiguities, unintended results, and technical errors present in prior laws. The primary intent of this bill is to ensure clarity and coherence in Minnesota's legislation, which can impact various sectors, especially in the realms of economic development and regulatory oversight. By correcting these issues, the bill aims to enhance the functioning of existing laws and support state efforts to streamline operations for businesses and government bodies alike.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HF447 is predominantly positive among bipartisan legislators who view it as a necessary step to improve the legislative process. Advocates argue that the bill enhances efficiency and accountability, while critics—if any—tend to express concern about the speed and potential oversight of the amendments made without thorough public scrutiny. Overall, discussions indicate a general agreement on the importance of maintaining legislative accuracy and responsiveness.

Contention

A point of contention regarding HF447 arises from the debates on the specifics of which reports should be maintained or eliminated. While the bill seeks to streamline legislative functions and improve economic conditions, there are worries among certain stakeholders that repealing past mandates could lead to a loss of vital data and oversight in specific sectors, such as the meat processing industry, where regulatory measures have historically been crucial.