Pennsylvania House Bill HB767

Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/30/23
• Refer: 3/30/23
• Refer: 6/6/23
• Report Pass: 6/20/23
• Refer: 6/20/23
• Report Pass: 6/21/23
• Engrossed: 6/21/23
• Refer: 6/29/23

Caption

Establishing the Pennsylvania Socially Diverse Farmers Commission and providing for its powers and duties.

Impact

The establishment of the Pennsylvania Socially Diverse Farmers Commission reflects a significant change in the state's legislative landscape, focusing specifically on the needs of socially disadvantaged groups within agriculture. The commission will review and recommend improvements related to education, capital access, land access, and the impacts of local government activities on disadvantaged farmers. This proactive approach aims to eliminate barriers that prevent these farmers from thriving and intends to foster a more equitable agricultural environment in Pennsylvania.

Summary

House Bill 767, introduced in Pennsylvania, seeks to establish the Pennsylvania Socially Diverse Farmers Commission, aimed at promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion within the state's agricultural sector. The commission will focus on improving opportunities for socially disadvantaged farmers, a group defined as individuals who own or operate farms but belong to populations that have faced social disadvantage due to economic or social factors. Through the creation of this commission, the bill emphasizes a structured approach to advocate for and support these farmers in attaining better access to resources, education, and funding.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 767 is positive, especially among proponents who view the commission as a much-needed step toward equity in agriculture. Supporters highlight the importance of addressing the historical disparities faced by socially disadvantaged farmers. However, there may be concerns regarding the implementation of the commission's recommendations and whether legislative action will effectively translate to tangible benefits for the target group, which could lead to some skepticism among stakeholders.

Contention

One notable point of contention may arise around the definitions and classifications of who qualifies as a 'socially disadvantaged farmer' and how the commission will effectively reach and cater to the needs of these individuals. There could also be debates about the allocation of resources and opportunities in a way that genuinely addresses the disparities that exist in agricultural practices, funding, and support services, particularly in areas deemed as economic justice zones.