Tennessee Senate Bill SB0791

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/30/23
• Engrossed: 3/30/23
• Enrolled: 4/5/23
• Passed: 4/24/23
• Chaptered: 5/3/23

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 4-49-104, relative to tax revenues.

Impact

The impact of SB 0791 on state laws includes an enhancement of funding mechanisms for emergency services, thereby potentially increasing the allocation of tax revenues to these critical areas. This change is aimed at ensuring that emergency services are adequately funded, which is crucial for the safety and welfare of communities. By officially recognizing emergency services in relation to local infrastructure projects, the bill creates a stronger linkage between funding and the support of emergency preparedness initiatives, arguably promoting public safety.

Summary

Senate Bill 0791, introduced in the Tennessee General Assembly, proposes to amend Section 4-49-104 of the Tennessee Code Annotated. Specifically, the bill adds the term 'emergency services' before 'local infrastructure projects', thereby expanding the types of projects eligible for certain tax revenues. This amendment suggests that emergency services are now recognized in the context of funding related to local infrastructure, reflecting a responsiveness to the needs of local communities in emergency preparedness and infrastructure resilience.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 0791 appears to be generally positive, as it responds to the needs for better emergency preparedness through legislative action. Supporters might argue that the amendment will lead to improved community readiness and resilience in the face of disasters. Given the bipartisan nature of the vote, with unanimous support in the floor vote, the bill seems to reflect a collective acknowledgment among legislators about the importance of funding emergency services.

Contention

While there may not be significant public contention noted around SB 0791, the discussions in legislative sessions may reflect the broader debates on funding priorities within state budgets. Some may argue about the implications of diverting funds to emergency services versus other pressing needs within local infrastructure. However, the unanimous support in the recent vote indicates a prevailing consensus on the importance of this amendment to enhance the state's readiness for emergencies.