Tennessee House Bill HB0834

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/30/23
• Refer: 2/2/23

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 68, Chapter 140, Part 3, relative to ground ambulance service providers.

Impact

If enacted, HB 834 has the potential to significantly impact the compensation structure for EMS personnel within the state. It aims to promote higher training standards and retention within the emergency medical services sector by incentivizing ongoing education. This could lead to improved service performance and enhanced patient care in emergency situations. Furthermore, the bill specifically includes provisions for emergency personnel who are also active military members, ensuring they receive the financial supplement despite potential training conflicts due to their service obligations.

Summary

House Bill 834 aims to enhance the financial compensation of full-time emergency medical services (EMS) personnel in Tennessee by providing a yearly pay supplement of $800 to those who complete at least 40 hours of in-service training. The bill recognizes the importance of regular training for EMS personnel to ensure they are adequately prepared for emergency situations. The proposed law seeks to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically targeting ground ambulance service providers, to establish this educational incentive as part of the compensation structure for EMTs and paramedics.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 834 appears largely positive, especially among supporters in the EMS community who see the value in incentivizing education and training. Advocates argue that better-trained personnel are crucial to public safety and that the financial incentive will encourage more individuals to pursue and maintain careers in EMS. However, there may be concerns regarding budget allocations and the sustainability of such pay supplements, especially in the context of overall state funding for emergency services.

Contention

Notable points of contention could arise regarding the sources of funding for the proposed pay supplement. Discussions might center around the state's ability to allocate additional funds amidst budget constraints or competing financial priorities. Additionally, there may be debate over the adequacy of the training programs and whether 40 hours is sufficient to meet the dynamic needs of emergency medical services. Opponents could argue about the need for more robust training rather than merely focusing on financial incentives.