Oregon 2023 Regular Session

Oregon House Bill HB2725

Introduced
1/9/23  
Refer
1/13/23  
Refer
4/4/23  
Refer
4/4/23  
Refer
5/25/23  
Refer
5/25/23  
Report Pass
6/13/23  
Engrossed
6/15/23  
Refer
6/15/23  
Report Pass
6/20/23  
Enrolled
6/22/23  
Passed
7/31/23  
Chaptered
8/15/23  

Caption

Relating to pharmacy benefit managers; and declaring an emergency.

Impact

The enactment of HB 2725 would have meaningful implications for state laws governing pharmacy operations and insurance practices. It proposes to clamp down on practices that may lead to increased costs for consumers, thereby promoting fairer drug pricing and potentially improving access to necessary medications. The bill represents a significant shift towards stricter regulation of entities that mediate healthcare services, which could lead to changes in how health benefits are managed across the state.

Summary

House Bill 2725 focuses on regulating pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) and seeks to establish a more structured framework for their operation. The bill aims to address concerns regarding transparency, accountability, and the potential impact of PBM practices on drug pricing and access to medications. By setting new standards for how PBMs operate, the bill is designed to enhance oversight of these entities, which play a significant role in the healthcare supply chain, particularly in managing prescription drug benefits for insured individuals.

Sentiment

General sentiment around HB 2725 appears supportive among consumer advocacy groups and some legislators who view it as a necessary step toward improving healthcare affordability and accessibility. Supporters emphasize the need for greater oversight of PBMs to curb practices that may disadvantage patients. However, there are concerns from some industry stakeholders who worry about the potential for increased regulatory burdens and unintended consequences that could arise from the implementation of stricter rules.

Contention

One notable area of contention surrounding HB 2725 is the balance between regulation and operational flexibility for pharmacy benefit managers. While proponents advocate for greater regulations to protect consumer interests, critics warn that excessive controls could lead to inefficiencies or administrative hurdles that could adversely affect pharmacy operations and patient access to medications. The debate centers on how to effectively manage the complexities of the pharmacy benefits system without stifling beneficial innovations or strategies that improve patient care.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

OR HB3013

Relating to pharmacy benefits; declaring an emergency.

OR HB4149

Relating to pharmacy benefits; declaring an emergency.

OR HB3212

Relating to pharmacy benefits.

OR HB740

Revise laws relating to pharmacies, pharmacy benefit managers, and other entities

OR HB226

Pharmacies/pharmacists/benefits Managers

OR SB121

Pharmacies/pharmacists/benefits Managers

OR HB1580

Relative to pharmacy benefits managers.

OR SB608

Relating to prescription drugs; and declaring an emergency.

OR SB2443

Relating To Pharmacy Benefit Managers.

OR H0233

An act relating to licensure and regulation of pharmacy benefit managers

Similar Bills

CA AB913

Pharmacy benefit managers.

CA SB362

Chain community pharmacies: quotas.

LA HB432

Provides for the regulation of pharmacy services administrative organizations (OR +$88,000 SG EX See Note)

MS HB1125

Pharmacy services; prohibit insurers and PBMs from requiring persons to obtain exclusively through pharmacies that they own.

LA HB387

Provides for the regulation of pharmacy services administrative organizations

CA AB401

Pharmacy: remote dispensing site pharmacy: telepharmacy: shared clinic office space.

CA AB690

Pharmacies: relocation: remote dispensing site pharmacy: pharmacy technician: qualifications.

AR SB593

To Amend The Arkansas Pharmacy Benefits Manager Licensure Act; And To Create The Pharmacy Services Administrative Organization Act.