West Virginia Senate Bill SB283

West Virginia 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/17/22
• Refer: 1/17/22

Caption

DEP rule relating to requirements for management of coal combustion residuals

Impact

The implementation of SB283 is expected to significantly impact state laws regarding environmental management and pollution control related to coal by providing a formalized framework for handling coal combustion residuals. By allowing the DEP to develop specific rules, the bill aims to standardize management practices, which could lead to more effective disposal methods and stricter compliance standards. This could ultimately foster a cleaner environment and promote sustainable practices in the state's coal industry.

Summary

Senate Bill 283, introduced by Senator Sypolt, focuses on the management of coal combustion residuals within West Virginia. Specifically, the bill seeks to authorize the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) to promulgate a legislative rule that establishes requirements for the management and oversight of coal combustion residuals. This initiative is crucial, as it aims to mitigate environmental risks associated with waste products generated from coal combustion, potentially enhancing public health and ecological preservation in the state.

Sentiment

Discussions surrounding SB283 reflect a generally favorable sentiment among legislators and environmental advocates, who see the bill as a proactive step towards addressing the environmental challenges posed by coal combustion products. Proponents argue that the legislative rule will empower the DEP to take necessary actions to safeguard public health and the environment, while also encouraging better practices within the coal industry. However, potential concerns may be raised by industry stakeholders regarding the implications of stricter regulations and the economic impacts on coal operations.

Contention

The primary contention surrounding SB283 revolves around the balance between regulatory oversight and the interests of the coal industry. While environmental advocates support the bill for its public health initiatives, industry opponents may argue that increased regulatory requirements could constrict operational efficiencies and financial viability. This tension reflects broader debates about environmental regulation and its implications for economic activity in regions reliant on coal production.