Tennessee House Bill HB1125

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/31/23
• Refer: 3/7/23

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 48, Chapter 101, Part 5, relative to charitable solicitations.

Impact

The impact of HB1125, if enacted, would be significant as it alters the timeline that charitable organizations must adhere to for regulatory compliance. By increasing the notification period, it aims to allow more flexibility for these organizations, which can often face operational challenges due to tight deadlines. This bill could lead to a reduction in compliance-related penalties and sanctions that organizations may face for failing to meet the previous seven-day requirement.

Summary

House Bill 1125 aims to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically in Title 48, Chapter 101, Part 5, which governs charitable solicitations. The main change introduced by this bill is the extension of the notification period for charitable organizations. Previously, the law required that organizations provide notification to the relevant authorities within seven days of receipt of a notification. HB1125 proposes to extend this timeframe to fourteen days, thereby granting charities a longer period to comply with the notification requirement. This amendment reflects an effort to streamline processes for charitable organizations operating in the state.

Conclusion

Overall, HB1125 presents a proposal aimed at enhancing the operational capacity of charitable organizations in Tennessee. However, as with any legislative adjustment, it could spark discussions about the necessary balance between regulatory oversight and supporting the effective functioning of nonprofits. The passage of this bill would not only reflect a proactive legislative approach to charity work but also raise important questions about regulatory frameworks in the sector.

Contention

While the bill appears to be a straightforward adjustment to the notification timeline, there may be concerns from various stakeholders regarding the effects of this extension. Some lawmakers might express worry that leniency in notification requirements could lead to decreased oversight of charitable activities, potentially allowing for misuse or misconduct in charitable solicitations. Additionally, there may be differing opinions on the balance between operational flexibility for charities and the necessity for timely reporting to ensure accountability.