In general provisions, providing for areas where landfills are prohibited.
Impact
The bill is anticipated to have a significant impact on local waste management policies and operations. By imposing this distance restriction, it could limit the locations available for new landfills or the expansion of existing ones, particularly in areas with high population density. This may lead to challenges for waste management entities and could also necessitate the development of alternative waste disposal solutions. The change could spur a regional analysis of waste management infrastructure, encouraging investments in technological advancements and increased recycling initiatives.
Summary
House Bill 992 aims to amend the Solid Waste Management Act by introducing restrictions on the location of landfills. Specifically, it prohibits landfills for municipal, residual, and hazardous waste from being situated within 2,500 feet of occupied dwellings. This regulation is designed to enhance public safety and protect residents from potential nuisances and health hazards posed by nearby waste disposal facilities. The bill reflects an effort by lawmakers to improve waste management practices while ensuring the well-being of community members living near waste sites.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HB 992 tends to focus on public health and environmental safety. Proponents of the bill, including various environmental advocacy groups, likely view the legislation favorably as a protective measure against the potential dangers associated with landfills. In contrast, some stakeholders in the waste management sector may express concern about the economic implications of the new restrictions, citing potential operational challenges and the need for greater flexibility in managing waste disposal practices.
Contention
Notable points of contention might arise from the perspectives of communities versus waste management stakeholders. While many residents may support distance regulations for safety reasons, those in the waste industry could argue that such restrictions overly constrain their operations and limit waste management capabilities. Additionally, there might be discussions on balancing local government autonomy in land-use decisions with broader regulatory frameworks set by the state. This friction could highlight the complexities involved in ensuring effective waste management without compromising community safety.
In general provisions, further providing for definitions; and, in residual waste, providing for prohibition on road spreading and land application of oil and gas wastewater.
In general provisions, further providing for definitions; and, in residual waste, providing for prohibition on road spreading and land application of oil and gas wastewater.
In general provisions, further providing for definitions; in residual waste, further providing for disposal, processing and storage of residual waste and providing for exempt special wastes; and making an editorial change.
In general provisions, further providing for definitions; in residual waste, further providing for disposal, processing and storage of residual waste and providing for exempt special wastes; and making an editorial change.