Maryland 2023 Regular Session

Maryland Senate Bill SB256

Introduced
1/25/23  
Refer
1/25/23  
Report Pass
2/27/23  
Engrossed
3/3/23  
Refer
3/6/23  
Report Pass
3/27/23  
Enrolled
3/30/23  
Chaptered
5/8/23  

Caption

Environment - Fire-Fighting Training - Oriented Strand Board - Prohibition

Impact

The enactment of SB256 would alter regulations concerning fire-fighting training standards within the state. By prohibiting the burning of OSB, the bill aims to eliminate potential health risks and environmental damage caused by the harmful emissions released during the burning process. While this change will likely improve training safety for firefighters, it may require adjustments to training protocols and methods, as OSB is frequently used for training due to its availability and cost-effectiveness.

Summary

Senate Bill 256 seeks to impose restrictions on the use of oriented strand board (OSB) in fire-fighting training exercises. Specifically, the bill prohibits the setting on fire or burning of OSB as part of training procedures for firefighters, aiming to enhance safety and reduce environmental hazards associated with the combustion of such materials. OSB is a commonly used engineered wood product; however, its combustion may release harmful substances, thus contributing to a safer fire-fighting training environment is the primary motivation behind this legislative action.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB256 appears to be largely supportive, particularly among fire safety advocates and environmental groups. Supporters of the bill emphasize the importance of health and safety in fire-fighting training, acknowledging that this legislation is a necessary step in improving safety measures. However, there could be concerns from training facilities regarding the potential increased costs or logistics involved in adapting training methods away from using OSB.

Contention

While the bill has garnered support from various stakeholders, potential contention may arise regarding the alternative materials that could replace OSB for training purposes. Some training organizations may express concerns about the costs and availability of substitutes, as well as any impacts on training efficacy. The legislature's decision to focus specifically on OSB reflects a broader discussion on balancing safety with practical training needs in fire-fighting operations.

Companion Bills

MD HB470

Crossfiled Environment - Fire-Fighting Training - Oriented Strand Board - Prohibition

MD HB1381

Carry Over Environment - Fire-Fighting Training - Oriented Strand Board - Prohibition

Previously Filed As

MD HB470

Environment - Fire-Fighting Training - Oriented Strand Board - Prohibition

MD HB1381

Environment - Fire-Fighting Training - Oriented Strand Board - Prohibition

MD HB275

Environment – PFAS Chemicals – Prohibitions and Requirements (George “Walter” Taylor Act)

MD SB273

Environment – PFAS Chemicals – Prohibitions and Requirements (George “Walter” Taylor Act)

MD HB133

Environment - Sealant Products - Prohibitions (Safer Sealant Act of 2022)

MD SB372

Environment - Sealant Products - Prohibitions (Safer Sealant Act of 2022)

MD HB1147

Environment - Playground Surfacing Materials - Prohibitions

MD SB916

Environment - Ethylene Oxide - Prohibition

MD HB1161

Environmental Standards For Appliances

MD HB30

Environment - On-Site Wastewater Services - Board, Fees, and Penalties

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.