Michigan House Bill HB5550

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/6/24
• Refer: 3/6/24
• Report Pass: 3/19/24

Caption

Elections: recall; meeting requirements to review recall petitions; modify. Amends secs. 951a & 952 of 1954 PA 116 (MCL 168.951a & 168.952).

Impact

The proposed changes under HB 5550 could significantly impact the processes of initiating recalls in Michigan. By enforcing more stringent requirements for what qualifies as a factual reason for a recall, the bill may reduce the frequency of frivolous recall attempts. Additionally, it establishes a clearer procedural framework that aims to ensure accountability and transparency in how recall petitions are handled. Ultimately, this could lead to an increased public trust in the recall process, as it necessitates a more thorough evaluation of the grounds for recalls by the board of state canvassers.

Summary

House Bill 5550 aims to amend Michigan's election law, specifically the provisions concerning the recall of elected officials. The bill modifies sections 951a and 952 of the 1954 PA 116, which outlines the requirements and processes for the circulation of recall petitions. Among its key provisions, the bill mandates that recall petitions clearly state factual reasons based on the officer's conduct during their current term and that any reason related to specific legislation must not misrepresent that legislation. Additionally, the bill introduces a requirement for a certificate of the circulator and places obligations on the board of state canvassers regarding the review and approval of recall petitions.

Contention

Nevertheless, the bill has attracted some contention. Critics argue that the stringent requirements could hinder the ability of citizens to seek recalls against elected officials, especially in contentious political climates. They may see these amendments as legislative overreach that creates barriers to accountability. Furthermore, the stipulation that any petition must be carefully vetted before circulation could prolong the recall process, making it less responsive to public sentiment. Overall, the discourse surrounding HB 5550 reflects broader tensions regarding election integrity and the balance between public oversight and legislative control.