Pennsylvania House Bill HB1077

Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/2/23
• Refer: 5/2/23
• Refer: 10/1/24
• Report Pass: 10/2/24
• Engrossed: 10/2/24
• Refer: 10/3/24

Caption

In responsible utility customer protection, further providing for declaration of policy and for definitions, providing for security deposits, further providing for payment arrangements, for termination of utility service, for reconnection of service, for complaints filed with commission, for public utility duties, for reporting of recipients of public assistance, for reporting to General Assembly and Governor, for nonapplicability and for expiration.

Impact

The proposed changes under HB1077 are significant for low-income households, as it restructures how public utilities manage billing, payment plans, and service termination processes. The bill seeks to protect vulnerable customers by ensuring that utilities cannot discontinue services based on income thresholds of 250% of the federal poverty level. This modification aims to prevent undue hardships, particularly during the winter months when service terminations can be most detrimental. Additionally, it mandates public utilities to offer extended payment arrangements and waivers for late fees for eligible low-income customers.

Summary

House Bill 1077 aims to amend Title 66 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, focusing on responsible utility customer protection. Key provisions include establishing clearer definitions related to household income, public utilities, and significant changes in circumstance. The bill places additional protections for consumers, specifically targeting limits on how public utilities can implement security deposits and termination of services for customers whose household income falls below certain federal poverty thresholds. By modifying payment arrangement timelines and requirements, HB1077 seeks to provide more fairness and clarity for residents needing utility assistance.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB1077 is generally supportive among advocacy groups and constituents focused on consumer protection. Many emphasize the importance of ensuring that low-income individuals are not disproportionately affected by utilities' policies, particularly regarding service terminations. Nevertheless, there are concerns from utility companies about the financial implications of the bill, which could impact their operational efficiency and revenue generation. This dichotomy highlights a balance that legislators will need to navigate carefully—protecting consumers while ensuring utilities remain financially viable.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the perceived balance between consumer protections and the operational capabilities of public utilities. Critics argue that stringent provisions could hinder utility companies’ financial viability, which may lead to reduced services in other areas or potential rate increases for all customers. Proponents counter that it is essential to prioritize the welfare of vulnerable populations over the businesses' profit motives. As such, there will likely be substantial debate on the implications of these changes, particularly regarding how they will be implemented and monitored by the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission.