Relating To Solemnization Of Marriages
The bill's approval reflects a procedural capacity for state officials to conduct solemn marriages, as indicated under Chapter 3 of Title 15 of the General Laws concerning the solemnization of marriages. Once passed, this act allows the named official to perform the marriage, illustrating the limited scope of the bill, which focuses solely on this event and does not alter broader civil marriage law or its practices. The impact of such legislation is minimal on state law but serves to personalize the recognition of marriage within the legal framework.
House Bill H8289 is a legislative act that specifically relates to the solemnization of marriages within the state of Rhode Island. It grants the Honorable Mary Ann Shallcross Smith the authority to join two individuals, Doreen S. Suprenard and Robert B. Kerfoot, in marriage in the City of Pawtucket on or about July 1, 2022. The bill is a tailored measure that operates notwithstanding any other general or special law, indicating its specific applicability to this occasion and the individuals involved. This kind of legislation is often used to address individual circumstances that may not be accommodated by existing statutes.
While H8289 appears non-controversial due to its specific nature, the process of enabling particular individuals to perform marriages might raise discussions about the consistency and principles of equal treatment under law. There might be contentions surrounding the potential for similar bills that could favor specific individuals for the exercise of state powers, and how this may set precedents for future legislative practices. Such measures could invite scrutiny regarding fairness and the potential for uneven access to personal rights and state authority.
Ultimately, House Bill H8289 serves as an example of legislative customization aimed at accommodating particular needs or requests for solemnization of marriages, reflecting the state's adaptability in its governing processes. The swift approval process, culminating in a unanimous vote of 67 yeas on June 7, 2022, suggests consensus on this localized issue, echoing broader themes of personal rights and local governance mechanisms within the state legislature.