Tennessee House Bill HB1077

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/31/23
• Refer: 2/2/23
• Refer: 3/14/23
• Refer: 3/22/23
• Refer: 4/3/23
• Refer: 4/12/23
• Refer: 4/18/23
• Chaptered: 5/24/23
• Passed: 5/24/23

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4; Title 43; Title 53; Title 67 and Title 68, relative to food that is available for consumption at farmers markets.

Impact

This bill is expected to have a positive impact on state laws by encouraging the growth of farmers markets, which connect local farmers directly with consumers. By reducing regulatory burdens, it hopes to increase the availability of local foods, thus supporting community vitality and local economies. Importantly, the bill sets forth specific health and safety requirements that vendors must follow to ensure consumer safety while also maintaining a balance with ease of operation for food vendors. Overall, HB 1077 enhances access to fresh produce while sustaining the operational fluidity of local farmers.

Summary

House Bill 1077 aims to amend several sections of the Tennessee Code Annotated to provide new definitions and regulations for farmers markets and food units operating within these markets. Notably, the bill proposes to exempt vendors at farmers markets from needing a license or permit to offer food samples, promoting local businesses by simplifying their operations. The legislation introduces terms specifically for 'farmers markets' and 'farmers market food units,' establishing clearer guidelines for their operation and food safety standards, thus ensuring local produce can be marketed and sampled more efficiently at these events.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 1077 appears largely positive among farmers and local business advocates, who see it as a way to support and enhance local food economies. Many stakeholders view the reduction of regulatory barriers as a critical measure that could lead to increased participation in farmers markets. However, some concerns have been raised about the adequacy of food safety measures, with critics emphasizing the need for a balance between easing regulations and maintaining consumer protection. This reflects an underlying tension between promoting economic activity and ensuring public health standards.

Contention

Notable points of contention include discussions about health and safety implications, with some members indicating that while the easing of permitting requirements is welcome, it must not compromise food quality and consumer safety. There is concern that without adequate regulations, there may be risks associated with foodborne illnesses or inadequate sanitation practices in the market setting. Additionally, local governments expressed worry about losing their authority to impose stricter health or safety measures, leading to potential variability in standards across different jurisdictions.