Tennessee Senate Bill SB0952

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/31/23
• Engrossed: 4/12/23
• Enrolled: 4/18/23
• Passed: 4/28/23
• Chaptered: 5/3/23

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 65, Chapter 28 and Title 65, Chapter 31, relative to utility facilities safety enforcement.

Impact

The amendments proposed by SB 952 intend to make the excavation process safer by clearly defining activities that require notification under existing laws, reducing potential hazards associated with confused or unmarked excavation areas. It also stipulates that the burdens of these regulations should not apply to property owners using non-mechanical tools on their own land or to limited scope work by member operators. This modification could streamline processes for minor excavation tasks while maintaining overall safety practices.

Summary

Senate Bill 952 aims to amend the Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically Title 65, Chapters 28 and 31, which pertain to the safety enforcement of utility facilities. This bill introduces provisions such as the definition of 'electronic white lining,' which involves marking the boundaries of excavation sites on digital maps. Furthermore, it redefines 'hand digging,' clarifying the practices allowed for property owners and operators, thus aiming to enhance safety and clarity regarding underground work and the corresponding responsibilities.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB 952 appears to be largely supportive, as it aims to clarify existing regulations that can be cumbersome for individuals and businesses involved in excavation. Stakeholders including contractors and local governments are likely to appreciate the enhanced understanding of safety responsibilities, which could lead to improved compliance and safety outcomes. However, the bill's language and definitions will need to be carefully monitored to ensure they effectively address real-world excavation scenarios without creating loopholes.

Contention

Notably, discussions regarding SB 952 may focus on the balance between necessary regulation and practical application of safety measures. While many support the bill due to its simplification of the rules governing excavations, some experts might raise concerns about potential ambiguities in the definitions of excavation work, particularly in distinguishing between minor and major excavation tasks. Such discussions reflect a broader conversation about maintaining safety standards while also encouraging efficient operational practices in the utility sector.