Maryland 2023 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB420

Introduced
1/30/23  
Refer
1/30/23  
Report Pass
3/6/23  
Engrossed
3/9/23  
Refer
3/10/23  
Report Pass
3/31/23  
Enrolled
4/5/23  
Chaptered
5/3/23  

Caption

Health Services Cost Review Commission - Hospital Rates - All-Payer Model Contract

Impact

The enactment of HB 420 is expected to significantly impact how hospital rates are set across the state, enhancing the Commission's authority to investigate costs, quality, and efficiency of hospital services. By instituting an all-payer model, the bill intends to create a more equitable system for healthcare cost management, where hospital services are compensated uniformly across all payers. This could lead to changes in how hospitals operate financially and may affect the overall healthcare market dynamics within the state.

Summary

House Bill 420, titled 'Health Services Cost Review Commission - Hospital Rates - All-Payer Model Contract', aims to empower the Health Services Cost Review Commission to set and review hospital service rates under an all-payer model framework. The bill stipulates that hospital rates need to be reasonable and should be established in compliance with the all-payer model contract. It emphasizes efficiency and equity in rate-setting, ensuring that charges for services are consistent across various purchaser classes.

Sentiment

Overall sentiments surrounding HB 420 appear to be positive, particularly from supporters who emphasize its potential to streamline and regulate hospital billing practices under a standardized system. Proponents argue that this will reduce disparities, ensure fairness in patient billing, and promote a healthier economic environment for healthcare provisions. However, there may be some reservations from various stakeholders regarding the new regulatory frameworks and their implementation.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns about how the all-payer model might affect the financial viability of certain hospitals, particularly those that rely heavily on specific payer types. Critics may worry about potential negative implications for smaller or rural facilities that might struggle under a uniform pricing structure. The discussions around the bill suggest a need for careful consideration of diverse hospital needs and how new regulations may impact them.

Companion Bills

MD SB234

Crossfiled Health Services Cost Review Commission - Hospital Rates - All-Payer Model Contract

Previously Filed As

MD SB234

Health Services Cost Review Commission - Hospital Rates - All-Payer Model Contract

MD HB1472

Hospital and health care cost and quality controls.

MD HB1123

Maryland Health Care Commission – Health Care Facilities – Cybersecurity for Hospitals

MD HB510

Health Care Facilities - Health Services Cost Review Commission - User Fee Assessment

MD SB917

Health Care Facilities - Health Services Cost Review Commission - User Fee Assessment

MD SB1103

Hospitals and Related Institutions – Outpatient Facility Fees

MD HB1333

Public Health - Maryland Commission on Health Equity and Commission on Public Health - Revisions

MD HB54

Health Services Cost Review Commission – User Fee Assessment – Repeal of Sunset

MD SB229

Health Services Cost Review Commission - User Fee Assessment - Repeal of Sunset

MD SB00811

An Act Concerning Hospitals, Insurers And Health Care Consumers.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.