New Jersey Senate Bill S133

New Jersey 2022-2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/11/22
• Refer: 1/11/22
• Report Pass: 3/7/22

Caption

Permits school bus driver to administer epinephrine to student in emergency under certain circumstances.

Impact

If enacted, S133 will modify existing state laws that govern the roles and responsibilities of school bus drivers in New Jersey. It establishes specific conditions that must be met for epinephrine administration, including written parental permission and proper training for bus drivers. This change clarifies the protocol around emergency medical responses on school buses, thereby enabling school districts and nonpublic schools to offer a higher level of emergency support without imposing legal liabilities on the drivers and the schools involved.

Summary

Senate Bill S133 introduces a framework that allows school bus drivers to administer epinephrine to students experiencing anaphylaxis during emergencies under certain conditions. This legislation is significant as it addresses the necessity for quick medical intervention in life-threatening situations while students are being transported. By broadening the responsibility of school bus drivers to include medical aid, the bill aims to enhance student safety during transport, aligning with efforts to provide timely assistance to students with severe allergies.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB S133 is supportive, especially among those advocating for student health and safety. Stakeholders, including parents and school administrators, recognize the proactive stance of permitting school bus drivers to act during emergencies. However, there are concerns surrounding the potential for increased responsibilities placed on school bus drivers who may already be managing numerous students and driving safely. The discussions reflect a balance between enhancing student safety and ensuring that the additional responsibilities do not overwhelm transportation staff.

Contention

While many support the bill for its life-saving implications, some opposition arises from worries about the adequacy of training provided to bus drivers and the potential for liability claims, despite the bill including liability protections. Critics argue that the bill could create complications or delays in emergency situations if the training is insufficient. The balance of ensuring student safety while managing legal and operational risks remains a pivotal point of contention as this bill progresses through legislative discussions.