Maryland 2023 Regular Session

Maryland Senate Bill SB310

Introduced
1/27/23  
Refer
1/27/23  
Report Pass
3/15/23  
Engrossed
3/17/23  
Refer
3/20/23  
Report Pass
4/7/23  
Enrolled
4/10/23  
Chaptered
5/8/23  

Caption

Natural Resources - Black Bear Damage Prevention and Reimbursement Fund - Uses

Impact

If enacted, SB310 will alter the framework for how Maryland addresses wildlife conflicts, particularly with black bears. It expands the scope of the Black Bear Damage Reimbursement Fund, which will now also support proactive projects that address potential conflicts. By requiring that grant proposals focus on nonlethal methods and community involvement, the bill emphasizes a shift away from punitive measures towards a more preventative, community-driven approach to wildlife management and agricultural protection.

Summary

Senate Bill 310, also known as the Black Bear Conflict Reduction and Damage Mitigation Prevention and Reimbursement Fund, seeks to amend existing regulations surrounding the management of black bear conflicts in Maryland. The bill establishes a fund dedicated not only to reimbursing individuals for damages caused by black bears but also to funding projects aimed at preventing such conflicts in the first place. This includes funding for community projects designed to reduce attractants for black bears and ultimately prevent encounters that could lead to damage and safety issues.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB310 appears to be generally supportive among stakeholders who prioritize wildlife conservation and agricultural protections. Advocates for the bill appreciate its focus on nonlethal methods, recognizing the ecological importance of black bears. However, some concern was raised regarding the funding cap for reimbursements, with critics worried that it may not adequately cover larger incidents of damage or be enough to incentivize effective long-term solutions.

Contention

Notable points of contention related to SB310 include discussions on the balance between human agricultural interests and wildlife protection. While many support the focus on nonlethal conflict reduction methods, others argue that the bill could inadvertently limit immediate responses to severe black bear encounters that pose a threat directly to people and property. Additionally, the adequacy of funding and the logistics of grant allocations may also be contentious topics as the bill moves through the legislative process.

Companion Bills

MD HB378

Crossfiled Natural Resources - Black Bear Conflict Reduction and Damage Reimbursement Fund - Uses

Previously Filed As

MD HB378

Natural Resources - Black Bear Conflict Reduction and Damage Reimbursement Fund - Uses

MD SB736

Natural Resources - Wildlife Damage Prevention and Reimbursement Fund - Establishment

MD HB1511

Natural Resources - Wildlife Damage Prevention and Reimbursement Fund - Establishment

MD SB422

Natural Resources - Black Bass Conservation Fund - Establishment

MD HB356

Allow livestock loss reimbursement for black bear predation

MD HB696

Natural Resources - Black Bass Conservation Fund - Establishment

MD HB717

Natural Resources - Public Lands - Acquisition, Staffing, Operations, and Funding

MD HB228

Natural Resources - Maryland State Parks - Funds and Plan Alterations

MD HB1386

Natural Resources - Black Bear Hunting - Permit Requirements

MD SB526

Natural Resources - Forest Preservation and Retention

Similar Bills

MD HB378

Natural Resources - Black Bear Conflict Reduction and Damage Reimbursement Fund - Uses

CA AB1019

California Uniform Construction Cost Accounting Commission.

CA AB2936

Higher Education Reconciliation Act.

CA AB1524

State Air Resources Board: zero-emission drayage trucks: Project 800 initiative.

CO SB210

Update Administration Of Certain Human Services

CA SB1476

Political Reform Act of 1974: State Bar of California.

CA AB3068

County government: contract legal counsel: auditor-controller.

CA AB1025

County government: contract legal counsel: elected treasurer-tax collector.