Pennsylvania Senate Bill SB754

Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/1/23
• Refer: 6/1/23
• Refer: 6/7/23
• Report Pass: 9/18/23
• Engrossed: 10/2/23
• Refer: 10/3/23

Caption

In general provisions, providing for certain transmittals and submissions to governmental bodies.

Impact

If enacted, SB754 would likely impact existing statutes and administrative rules governing public administration in the state. The proposed changes could lead to improved clarity in the processes surrounding governmental submissions, enhancing the overall efficiency within state agencies. This alignment could address existing inconsistencies and streamline procedures, making it easier for both citizens and organizations to interact with government entities.

Summary

SB754 focuses on enhancing governmental processes by addressing how transmittals and submissions to governmental bodies should be governed. The bill aims to clarify certain regulations and procedures related to the submission of documents and communications that affect public administration. The intention behind this legislation is to foster more efficient and transparent governance by standardizing the protocols related to governmental communications.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB754 appears to be predominantly positive, with a consensus on the need for clearer processes as a means of promoting better governance. Stakeholders advocate that improved governmental operations can lead to increased public trust and engagement. However, there may also be concerns regarding the potential for over-regulation if the standards become overly complex or if compliance burdens are increased for smaller governmental bodies.

Contention

Discussions around SB754 may reveal some contention regarding how broadly or narrowly the bill defines the procedures for governmental submissions. While many legislators and advocacy groups support the move towards better transparency and efficiency, some opponents may express concerns about the practical implications of implementing standardized procedures. This includes fears that a one-size-fits-all approach could overlook the unique needs of various governmental entities.