Washington 2023-2024 Regular Session

Washington House Bill HB2482

Introduced
1/26/24  
Refer
1/26/24  
Report Pass
2/5/24  
Refer
2/5/24  
Engrossed
2/12/24  
Refer
2/14/24  
Report Pass
2/15/24  
Refer
2/19/24  
Report Pass
2/26/24  
Enrolled
3/7/24  
Chaptered
3/26/24  

Caption

Reinstating semiconductor tax incentives.

Impact

The proposed measures outlined in HB 2482 would significantly affect state laws governing tax breaks and incentives for businesses operating in the semiconductor field. By reinstating these incentives, the bill proposes a framework that encourages both local and out-of-state companies to invest in semiconductor facilities, fostering job creation and technological innovation. This could lead to a more robust economy that benefits from increased high-tech manufacturing and research, addressing the growing demand for such products in various sectors.

Summary

House Bill 2482 focuses on reinstating tax incentives specifically tailored for the semiconductor industry. The bill aims to stimulate economic growth by encouraging investment in semiconductor manufacturing within the state. By providing financial incentives, the legislation seeks to position the state as a competitive player in the growing tech sector, aligning with national interests in strengthening domestic semiconductor production. Supporters view this as a strategic move to not only boost the local job market but also to enhance the overall technological capacity of the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 2482 was largely positive, particularly among legislators and stakeholders in the technology and manufacturing sectors. Proponents argued that reinstating tax incentives is crucial for advancing the state's competitiveness in the global semiconductor market. However, there are concerns among some critics regarding the long-term sustainability of such incentives, questioning whether these tax breaks will effectively lead to lasting economic benefits or if they merely serve as a temporary solution to attract businesses.

Contention

Notable points of contention included the debate over the adequacy of the proposed tax incentives and their potential impact on state revenues. Critics often raised concerns about the fairness of providing substantial tax breaks to specific industries while other sectors might struggle without similar support. Additionally, there were discussions about the broader implications of focusing heavily on the semiconductor industry, including the risk of creating an economic model that is overly dependent on a single sector.

Companion Bills

WA SB6137

Crossfiled Reinstating semiconductor tax incentives.

Previously Filed As

WA SB6137

Reinstating semiconductor tax incentives.

WA LB616

Provide for awards under the ImagiNE Nebraska Act relating to the federal Creating Helpful Incentives to Produce Semiconductors (CHIPS) for America Act

WA LB617

Create the Economic Development Cash Fund to award a grant relating to the federal Creating Helpful Incentives to Produce Semiconductors (CHIPS) for America Act

WA SB5916

Reinstating the indigent defense task force.

WA SB5661

Reinstating skill center class size.

WA HB2269

Reinstating a sales and use tax exemption for clay targets used by nonprofit gun clubs.

WA LB1400

Adopt the Relocation Incentive Act and provide tax incentives

WA LB1280

Provide eligibility for child care assistance to qualified apprentices and semiconductor workers

WA HB1936

Concerning tax incentives for farmers.

WA HB1019

Concerning tax incentives for farmers.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.