Minnesota 2023-2024 Regular Session

Minnesota Senate Bill SF776

Introduced
1/26/23  
Refer
1/26/23  
Refer
3/6/23  

Caption

Firefighting foam use prohibition and certain exemption authorization; appropriating money

Impact

If enacted, the bill will significantly alter the regulations governing firefighting foam and will ensure that entities using such equipment must implement environmental protections during testing and training. Starting January 1, 2024, the bill will formally prohibit the discharge of PFAS-containing firefighting foam for non-emergency purposes. It allows limited exemptions, with strict criteria for their approval, which aims to ensure that any continued use of PFAS foams is strictly regulated and monitored. Furthermore, it requires state reports on firefighter exposure to PFAS in turnout gear, emphasizing a commitment to both environmental stewardship and public health.

Summary

SF776 focuses on prohibiting the use of certain types of firefighting foam that contain perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (commonly known as PFAS) in Minnesota. The bill seeks to amend existing legislation by gradually phasing out the use of PFAS-containing foam, particularly class B firefighting foams that are used for flammable liquid fires. It imposes strict regulations on the manufacture, distribution, and use of this foam, while also laying out a framework for temporary exemptions for terminals and oil refineries to utilize such foam until alternative solutions are available. The bill is a response to growing concerns over the environmental and health impacts of PFAS chemicals, particularly in relation to water contamination and firefighter safety.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SF776 is supportive among environmental advocates and health professionals who view the prohibition of PFAS-containing foams as a vital step toward safeguarding public health and the environment. However, there is contention among industry stakeholders who operate terminals and oil refineries, citing concerns about the practicality of transitioning to fully fluorine-free alternatives before sufficient replacements are developed. The discussions reflect a balancing act between immediate health concerns and long-term feasibility for businesses dependent on firefighting foam.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the bill's provisions for waivers, which might allow certain facilities to continue using PFAS-containing foam well into the future if they can demonstrate that alternatives are not available. This has led to debates over the adequacy of existing solutions and the timeline for transitioning to safer alternatives. Moreover, while the bill addresses the urgent need to reduce human exposure to harmful chemicals, it also raises questions about how stringent the exemptions should be to avoid putting industry operational needs at risk, highlighting tensions between environmental regulations and business interests.

Companion Bills

MN HF742

Similar To Firefighting foam use prohibited, exemptions allowed, reports required, and money appropriated.

Previously Filed As

MN HF742

Firefighting foam use prohibited, exemptions allowed, reports required, and money appropriated.

MN HF1869

Prohibitions of certain PFAS-containing firefighting foam at airport hangars delayed.

MN SF834

PFAS in certain products prohibition

MN HF1627

PFAS products exempted or prohibitions delayed, PFAS reporting requirements modified, lead-containing product prohibitions delayed, and PFAS-containing firefighting foam prohibitions at airport hangars delayed.

MN HF1906

Electronic and internal components exempted from PFAS prohibitions, prohibitions delayed on lead-containing products, and PFAS-containing firefighting foam at airport hangars prohibitions delayed.

MN A5537

Permits fire departments to use certain Class B firefighting foam for one year after prohibition takes effect.

MN SB1044

Firefighting equipment and foam: PFAS chemicals.

MN H732

Manage PFAS Firefighting Foam/Gear

MN SF2408

Prohibition delay of certain PFAS-containing firefight foam at airport hangars

MN H1257

Discharge and Use of Firefighting Foam

Similar Bills

CA SB1044

Firefighting equipment and foam: PFAS chemicals.

MN HF742

Firefighting foam use prohibited, exemptions allowed, reports required, and money appropriated.

CA AB1299

Peace officers: employment.

MN SF834

PFAS in certain products prohibition

NJ S2712

Prohibits sale, manufacture, distribution, and use of firefighting foam containing intentionally added perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances; requires DEP to establish collection and disposal program; appropriates $250,000.

NJ A5537

Permits fire departments to use certain Class B firefighting foam for one year after prohibition takes effect.

NJ A4125

Prohibits sale, manufacture, distribution, and use of firefighting foam containing intentionally added perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances; requires DEP to establish collection and disposal program; appropriates $250,000.

NJ S4346

Provides extension for fire departments on prohibition on use of firefighting foam containing intentionally added perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances; appropriates $500,000 to DEP for grant program to reimburse municipalities for costs of replacing firefighting foam.