Wisconsin Senate Bill SB932

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/19/24
• Refer: 1/19/24
• Report Pass: 2/6/24
• Refer: 2/6/24
• Report Pass: 2/7/24
• Engrossed: 2/13/24
• Refer: 2/20/24
• Enrolled: 2/27/24
• Vetoed: 3/29/24
• Failed: 5/15/24

Caption

Modifications to building program project budgets, selection of project architects and engineers, single prime contracting, agency cooperation with energy conservation contractors, timeline for claims before the Claims Board, and making a transfer to the state building trust fund. (FE)

Impact

The impact of SB932 is significant as it seeks to streamline current practices in selecting architects and engineers for state projects, potentially leading to more cost-effective and timely project completions. By establishing clearer guidelines for project budgets and reducing regulatory hurdles, the bill is designed to encourage greater cooperation among agencies involved in construction and energy conservation efforts, ultimately benefiting state infrastructure development.

Summary

Senate Bill 932 introduces various modifications to the processes regarding building program project budgets, the selection of project architects and engineers, single prime contracting, and agency cooperation with energy conservation contractors. It also addresses the timeline for claims before the Claims Board and proposes a transfer to the state building trust fund. The bill aims to enhance efficiency in public construction projects and promote better resource allocation for state buildings and infrastructure improvements.

Contention

Despite its potential benefits, the bill also faces points of contention. Critics may argue that the changes could centralize too much authority within state agencies, limiting local discretion in construction projects and potentially minimizing the role of local architects and engineers. Concerns about transparency and oversight in project bidding and budget allocations may arise, especially given the emphasis on single prime contracting. This provision could lead to disputes over project management and responsibility, as well as concerns regarding accountability for public spending.