Oregon House Bill HB3243

Oregon 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/14/23
• Refer: 2/16/23
• Report Pass: 3/27/23
• Engrossed: 4/5/23
• Refer: 4/5/23
• Report Pass: 6/15/23
• Failed: 6/25/23

Caption

Relating to violations of the Insurance Code as unlawful trade practices.

Impact

The bill's implementation is expected to enhance consumer protection by providing clearer pathways for individuals to seek justice against unfair practices in the insurance sector. By categorizing unfair claim settlement practices as unlawful, the legislation aims to hold insurance providers accountable for their dealings with consumers. It also sets a structure in which the Director of the Department of Consumer and Business Services must request enforcement action before a prosecuting attorney can pursue any insurance-related claims under the Unlawful Trade Practices Act. This could help improve transparency and accountability within the insurance industry.

Summary

House Bill 3243 addresses violations of the Insurance Code as unlawful trade practices in Oregon. The bill amends the existing Unlawful Trade Practices Act to expand the definition of goods and services subject to penalties for unlawful trade practices to include insurance. It introduces provisions that allow for enforcement actions against unfair claim settlement practices, which are now recognized explicitly as violations under this act. Additionally, the bill permits courts to award equitable relief and monetary damages to affected parties, enhancing consumer rights in relation to insurance claims.

Contention

There may be points of contention regarding the balance between regulatory oversight and the operational freedoms of insurance companies. Supporters might argue that the bill strengthens consumer rights and prevents companies from exploiting consumers through unfair practices. However, critics could express concerns about regulatory overreach or argue that increased liability for insurance providers could result in higher costs for consumers. The oversight requirements placed on the Department of Consumer and Business Services could also raise questions about the efficacy and efficiency of regulatory enforcement.