West Virginia House Bill HB4529

West Virginia 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/3/22
• Refer: 2/3/22

Caption

Supplementing and amending the appropriations of public moneys to the DHHR, Consolidated Medical Services Fund

Impact

The enactment of HB4529 will result in an increase in state funding to health services, thereby expanding the capacity for service delivery within the DHHR. This infusion of funds is particularly crucial as it aims to maintain and enhance health services during a time when such resources are often needed the most. The bill indicates a recognition of the importance of health services amid ongoing health challenges and aims to mitigate potential funding shortages in critical operational areas related to health facilities.

Summary

House Bill 4529 is a legislative measure introduced in West Virginia aimed at supplementing and amending the appropriations of public moneys for the Department of Health and Human Resources (DHHR). Specifically, the bill seeks to allocate additional funds from the remaining unappropriated surplus balance in the State Fund, General Revenue, to the DHHR's Consolidated Medical Services Fund for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022. The bill reflects the allocation of approximately $15.625 million intended to support the operations of institutional facilities and health services covered under the DHHR's jurisdiction.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB4529 appears generally supportive, particularly among legislators who prioritize healthcare funding and the well-being of residents dependent on state health services. The bill may receive backing from various stakeholders advocating for improved health infrastructure and services in West Virginia. However, there may also be points of contention pertaining to how the funds are allocated among other pressing needs within the state budget, which could lead to discussions on resource distribution.

Contention

While the primary focus of HB4529 is on increasing appropriations for health services, potential contention could arise from competing interests regarding budget allocations. Legislators might debate the prioritization of this supplemental funding in light of other areas requiring attention and funding within the state's overall fiscal plan. Concerns may also be raised about the sustainability of such funding levels in future budget years and the implications for balancing the state budget amidst various funding demands.