Michigan Senate Bill SB0928

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/13/24
• Refer: 6/13/24
• Report Pass: 6/20/24
• Engrossed: 6/20/24
• Refer: 6/20/24
• Report Pass: 9/25/24
• Enrolled: 9/26/24
• Chaptered: 10/9/24
• Passed: 10/9/24

Caption

Family law: paternity; medical expenses related to birth of a child born out of wedlock paid by Medicaid; modify. Amends sec. 2 of 1956 PA 205 (MCL 722.712).

Impact

The introduction of SB0928 can significantly affect how medical expenses are divided between parents, especially in cases where the father of the child was not married to the mother at the time of birth. The bill not only seeks to establish a clear guideline for judges in determining parental obligations but also reinvigorates the discussion about the financial responsibilities of both parents. It emphasizes equal accountability under the law, potentially setting a precedent for future rulings in similar cases. Importantly, it also includes provisions for parents who marry after the birth of the child, which can alter the financial landscape for the parents concerned.

Summary

Senate Bill 0928 aims to modify existing family law in Michigan concerning the liabilities of parents regarding medical expenses related to a child's birth, especially for children born out of wedlock. The bill highlights the responsibilities of both parents to cover medical expenses incurred during pregnancy and childbirth. If Medicaid does not cover these expenses, the bill outlines a procedure for court involvement to apportion these costs between parents based on their financial capabilities. This reflection of parental responsibility within the legal framework addresses the disparities often faced by single parents in securing medical expense reimbursements.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB0928 appears to be generally supportive among legislators who recognize the need for clarity and equity in family law. However, there may be concerns among some advocacy groups regarding how effectively the bill addresses the needs of low-income families and those reliant on Medicaid. The discussions reflect an awareness of the delicate balance between enforcing parental obligations and ensuring that financial pressures do not exacerbate existing vulnerabilities among single parents. Overall, there is an optimism that the bill can enhance the welfare of children born out of wedlock by clarifying parental obligations.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around the definitions and boundaries of parental financial responsibilities. Critics may argue that the bill does not sufficiently account for the challenges faced by parents with limited incomes who might struggle to cover these expenses, even with a court order. The emphasis on court discretion for cost apportionment raises questions about the consistency of applications across the state. Additionally, there is a broader debate on whether such legal structures adequately address the welfare of children and if they risk further entrenching financial burdens rather than alleviating them.