Tennessee House Bill HB1465

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/31/23
• Refer: 2/2/23

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4; Title 38; Title 39; Title 54; Title 58 and Title 65, relative to critical infrastructure.

Impact

If enacted, HB1465 will create a strategic overhaul in the way Tennessee addresses infrastructure security by defining critical infrastructure clearly and assigning roles to various state departments and agencies. It aims to foster collaboration between state and local governments, federal departments, and the private sector for a more robust security strategy. The bill underscores the need for tactical improvements that can be implemented rapidly to mitigate vulnerabilities and ensure that services vital to citizens are less susceptible to threats, thereby enhancing the state’s resilience against attacks.

Summary

House Bill 1465, titled the 'Critical Infrastructure Identification, Prioritization, and Protection Act', aims to amend the Tennessee Code to enhance the protection of critical infrastructure and key resources against potential terrorist attacks. The bill emphasizes the importance of safeguarding systems vital to public safety, economic stability, and the overall functioning of society. It establishes a comprehensive policy framework for state agencies to identify, prioritize, and coordinate protective measures for critical infrastructure, which includes systems related to telecommunications, energy, water services, and transportation.

Contention

Debate around HB1465 may arise concerning the balance between security measures and individual rights. Some may argue that expansive security protocols could lead to overreach or mismanagement of information regarding critical infrastructure. Additionally, there may be Concerns regarding how these protective measures could impact economic activities and the rights of residents, as the bill aims to ensure protections while also maintaining economic security. The approach taken in the bill reflects a growing sensitivity to the threats against infrastructure in an evolving security landscape, potentially leading to disagreements about the fine line between necessary security steps and infringing on civil liberties.