Relating to emergency preparedness plans for business entities that receive public funds; declaring an emergency.
Impact
This bill, if enacted, will directly influence the regulatory landscape regarding emergency protocols within businesses receiving state funding. By mandating that these entities develop and implement emergency preparedness plans, the bill aims to minimize the risks associated with potential emergencies. As a result, businesses may need to allocate resources towards creating and maintaining these plans, ultimately leading to improved safety standards and possibly affecting their operational costs.
Summary
House Bill 3367 seeks to establish requirements for emergency preparedness plans for business entities that receive public funds. The bill emphasizes the importance of having robust strategies in place to ensure these businesses can effectively respond to emergencies, thereby protecting both their operations and public investment. The intention behind this legislative measure is to promote accountability and preparedness among businesses that benefit from state funds, ensuring they are equipped to handle crises effectively.
Sentiment
Overall, the sentiment towards HB3367 appears to be supportive, reflecting a recognition of the importance of emergency preparedness in the business sector for the protection of public investments. However, there are voices of concern from business owners who fear potential costs and administrative burdens associated with compliance. This has led to a discussion around the balance between necessary regulation and the imposition of additional duties on businesses, particularly smaller entities.
Contention
Notable points of contention regarding HB3367 include concerns about the implications for smaller businesses that may struggle with the administrative measures required to comply with the new regulations. Critics argue that the financial burden may disproportionately affect these smaller entities, potentially discouraging public funding participation. Supporters, however, argue that the long-term benefits of having a prepared business environment far outweigh the initial costs, suggesting that the proactive approach will ultimately lead to greater resilience in crises.
Requires DOH to establish Regional Hospital System Program for Emergency Preparedness and to annually survey preparedness and resiliency of State's hospital system in event of public emergency.