Pennsylvania House Bill HB987

Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 10/3/23
• Refer: 10/3/23

Caption

In matters affecting government units, further providing for exceptions to sovereign immunity and providing for claims for wrongful conviction and imprisonment; and establishing the Exonerated Individual Community Trust Fund.

Impact

The bill introduces a formal framework for individuals who have been exonerated to seek compensation from the Commonwealth, including provisions that outline eligibility requirements, claims processes, and compensation details. This reform may result in significant changes within the criminal justice system by emphasizing accountability for the Commonwealth regarding wrongful convictions and positioning the state to address and rectify past injustices. The creation of the community trust fund will further allow exonerated individuals to access necessary services and support as they transition back into society.

Summary

House Bill 987 seeks to amend Title 42 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes by expanding exceptions to sovereign immunity to include claims for wrongful conviction and imprisonment. Additionally, it establishes the Exonerated Individual Community Trust Fund to provide financial support and resources for individuals wrongfully convicted of crimes. It aims to create a comprehensive system for compensating those who have been wrongfully imprisoned and to assist them in reintegrating into society after their release.

Sentiment

Discussions around HB 987 reflect a supportive sentiment towards addressing wrongful convictions, with broad recognition of the need for justice and reparations. Advocates for criminal justice reform have generally backed the bill, applauding its intent to provide justice for those wrongfully imprisoned. However, concerns have been raised regarding the potential burden on state resources and the ability of the existing system to manage and implement such findings of liability efficiently.

Contention

Notable points of contention arise around the definition of wrongful conviction and the criteria for eligibility outlined in the bill, which some critics argue may be too narrow or complex. Skeptics have expressed concern about the feasibility of the compensation process and whether it could lead to an influx of claims that the state may struggle to accommodate. Additionally, there are apprehensions regarding the oversight of the Exonerated Individual Community Trust Fund and its capacity to effectively distribute aid and resources to those in need.