Pennsylvania Senate Bill SB944

Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 9/28/23
• Refer: 9/28/23

Caption

In criminal history record information, further providing for expungement.

Impact

If enacted, SB944 would have a significant impact on state laws regarding criminal history records, particularly for young adults. This legislation proposes a more streamlined process for expungement, which can encourage personal and professional rehabilitation. It reflects a growing recognition of the need for second chances in legal proceedings and addresses concerns that prior convictions can unduly hinder individuals’ ability to find employment and reintegrate into their communities.

Summary

Senate Bill 944 seeks to amend Title 18 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes to update provisions related to the expungement of criminal history records. The bill specifically allows for the expungement of records for individuals aged 21 or older who have been convicted of certain violations, such as underage drinking, provided they have completed all terms of their sentences. This change is intended to facilitate the reintegration of individuals into society by allowing for the clearing of their criminal records under specific conditions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB944 appears to be largely positive among advocacy groups focused on criminal justice reform. Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary step toward reducing the long-term disadvantages that individuals with minor convictions face. Critics may raise concerns about the implications for public safety and the need for accountability in cases involving repeated offenses; however, the general trend in legislative discussions suggests a supportive viewpoint inclined toward rehabilitation over punishment.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding SB944 may center on the balance between expungement rights and public safety. Opponents of broad expungement measures may highlight risks associated with concealing criminal backgrounds, particularly in cases involving violent offenses or repeat offenders. The debate could focus on ensuring that while individuals have the opportunity for rehabilitation, the public's right to safety and awareness of past criminal offenses is also upheld.