Missouri 2023 Regular Session

Missouri Senate Bill SB426

Introduced
1/4/23  

Caption

Enacts provisions relating to payments for prescription drugs

Impact

The enactment of SB426 would bring notable changes to how prescription drugs are reimbursed in Missouri. It stipulates that covered entities must be reimbursed at least as much as non-covered entities for the same drugs, enabling a fairer financial landscape for entities serving vulnerable populations. Additionally, the bill includes penalties for compliance violations, which indicates a push towards strict enforcement that aims to protect the interests of these entities and the patients they serve.

Summary

Senate Bill 426 aims to amend chapter 376 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri by adding a new section that relates to the payment systems for prescription drugs. The bill particularly focuses on ensuring that health carriers and pharmacy benefits managers do not discriminate against covered entities or specified pharmacies when it comes to the reimbursement of 340B drugs. This is significant as it seeks to enhance the access and financial viability of entities that participate in the 340B Drug Pricing Program, which is designed to allow hospitals and clinics to provide lower-cost medications to eligible patients.

Sentiment

Discussions surrounding SB426 seemed to be largely supportive among healthcare providers and advocacy groups that benefit from the 340B program. Supporters argue that this bill is crucial for maintaining access to affordable medications for underserved communities. However, there may be contention from pharmacy benefits managers and some insurers who may view the regulations as overly restrictive or financially burdensome, reflecting a typical conflict in healthcare legislation between cost control and access to care.

Contention

Notable points of contention around SB426 highlight the balancing act between ensuring equitable pricing for drug reimbursement and the financial implications for health plans and pharmacy benefits managers. Critics may argue that stringent regulations could lead to increased costs for insurers, which could ultimately affect premium pricing and availability of coverage for consumers. The bill also entails a level of oversight from the Missouri Department of Commerce and Insurance, which may face pushback regarding regulatory authority and enforcement mechanisms.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

MO SB978

Enacts provisions relating to payments for prescription drugs

MO SB1035

Enacts provisions relating to payments for prescription drugs

MO SB679

Enacts provisions relating to payments for prescription drugs

MO SB1213

Enacts provisions relating to payments for prescription drugs

MO SB402

Enacts provisions relating to payments for prescription drugs

MO SB921

Enacts provisions relating to payments for prescription drugs

MO SB372

Enacts provisions relating to payments for prescription drugs

MO SB751

Enacts provisions relating to distribution of 340B drugs

MO SB45

Enacts provisions relating to payments for prescription drugs

MO SB512

Enacts provisions relating to payments for prescription drugs

Similar Bills

CA AB913

Pharmacy benefit managers.

CA SB362

Chain community pharmacies: quotas.

LA HB432

Provides for the regulation of pharmacy services administrative organizations (OR +$88,000 SG EX See Note)

MS HB1125

Pharmacy services; prohibit insurers and PBMs from requiring persons to obtain exclusively through pharmacies that they own.

CA AB401

Pharmacy: remote dispensing site pharmacy: telepharmacy: shared clinic office space.

LA HB387

Provides for the regulation of pharmacy services administrative organizations

MS HB1119

Pharmacy benefit managers; revise provisions related to.

CA AB690

Pharmacies: relocation: remote dispensing site pharmacy: pharmacy technician: qualifications.