Michigan House Bill HB6120

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 12/10/24
• Refer: 11/14/24
• Report Pass: 12/10/24

Caption

Law enforcement: other; disclosures by law enforcement officers act; modify definition of involuntary statement. Amends sec. 1 of 2006 PA 563 (MCL 15.391).

Impact

If enacted, HB6120 will make significant modifications to existing statutes regarding the treatment and disclosure of statements made by law enforcement personnel. By clearly defining the nature of involuntary statements, the bill is expected to create a more structured legal framework for handling such statements. This change may also set precedents for how employment laws are applied within law enforcement agencies across Michigan, potentially influencing internal investigations and the treatment of officers who might otherwise face disciplinary actions based on coerced statements.

Summary

House Bill 6120 aims to modify the definition of 'involuntary statements' made by law enforcement officers under the 2006 PA 563. The proposed changes define an involuntary statement as any information provided by a law enforcement officer that is compelled under threat of employment sanctions, such as dismissal. This definition clarifies that if a law enforcement officer knowingly provides false or misleading information under duress, it does not count as an involuntary statement. This bill seeks to protect the rights of officers and ensure that any compelled statements cannot be used indiscriminately against them.

Contention

The bill could become a focal point in discussions regarding accountability and transparency within law enforcement. Proponents may argue that the modifications are essential to safeguarding officers from unjust treatment and protecting their rights under duress. Conversely, critics might contend that this could create loopholes for law enforcement personnel, allowing them to evade accountability for misconduct by claiming that statements made under pressure were involuntary. This tension between protecting law enforcement officers and maintaining public accountability could spark considerable debate in the legislative process.