Modifies Senate Rules 6, 25, and 28 relating to standing committees of the Senate
Impact
If adopted, SR3 will directly influence how bills are processed in the Senate by creating additional steps for certain types of legislation, particularly those with significant financial implications. The requirement for fiscal oversight on bills with substantial expected impacts is intended to enhance accountability and ensure that all financial decisions made through legislation are thoroughly vetted. The amendments proposed in SR3 are seen as a necessary evolution of Senate operations to maintain fiscal responsibility.
Summary
Senate Resolution 3 (SR3) proposes changes to Senate Rules 6, 25, and 28 relating to the structure and functioning of Senate standing committees. The resolution aims to streamline the legislative process by modifying the mechanisms through which bills are considered, particularly addressing the referral process for new legislation that could impact fiscal oversight. This includes stipulating conditions under which bills that increase state expenditures or reduce revenues by over $250,000 will be referred to the Committee on Fiscal Oversight before further consideration by the Senate.
Sentiment
The general sentiment surrounding SR3 appears to be supportive among the Senate's majority, with a unanimous vote of 31 yeas and no nays recorded during the adoption. This reflects a collective agreement on the need for improved governance procedures within the Senate. However, there is a possibility that some members may contend the increased oversight could slow down the legislative process, which might be a point of concern for those eager to pass urgent legislation.
Contention
While there has been broad support for SR3, some legislative members have raised potential contention regarding the efficiency of the new processes it establishes. Critics might argue that increased financial scrutiny could create delays in the legislative process, especially for bills that do not pose significant fiscal risks but nonetheless require expedited attention. This raises ongoing discussions about how best to balance accountability with the need for timely legislative decision-making within the Senate.
Provides relative to disciplinary hearings by professional and occupational licensing boards and commissions. (8/1/18) (EN SEE FISC NOTE SG RV See Note)