New Jersey Senate Bill S783

New Jersey 2022-2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/18/22
• Refer: 1/18/22
• Report Pass: 2/3/22
• Report Pass: 2/28/22
• Engrossed: 3/3/22
• Refer: 3/7/22
• Report Pass: 2/9/23
• Engrossed: 2/27/23
• Enrolled: 2/27/23
• Chaptered: 3/17/23
• Passed: 3/17/23

Caption

Establishes Opioid Recovery and Remediation Fund; establishes requirements for proceeds from opioid settlements to support substance use disorder prevention and treatment programs.

Impact

The enactment of S783 significantly modifies the landscape of state funding for opioid-related recovery efforts by ensuring that resources from litigation settlements are directly funneled into evidence-based programs. This compliance will enhance the state's ability to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of funded programs through consistent reporting requirements. Involvement from local entities and review councils will ensure that allocated funds meet the specific needs of communities affected by substance use disorders.

Summary

S783 establishes the Opioid Recovery and Remediation Fund in New Jersey, with an emphasis on utilizing proceeds from opioid settlements to support substance use disorder treatment and prevention programs. This dedicated fund will ensure a systematic approach in addressing the opioid crisis, enabling a focused allocation of resources to combat related health issues effectively. The legislation mandates that funds must only be used for specific purposes related to substance use disorders, mental health treatment, and other associated domains outlined in the bill.

Sentiment

General sentiment around S783 appears to be positive, as it has garnered bipartisan support in the Senate with a significant passing vote. Supporters view the bill as a proactive measure in combating the ongoing opioid epidemic by providing structured funding for prevention and treatment programs. Local advocates have also shown support, emphasizing the need for dedicated resources to facilitate recovery efforts in their communities. However, there are concerns raised about the effective implementation of the fund's allocations and the maintenance of oversight during the disbursement process.

Contention

Some points of contention associated with S783 revolve around the potential for misallocation of funds if not managed properly. Critics of similar state-level initiatives express concerns regarding bureaucracy and efficiency of fund administration. Furthermore, the legislation's reliance on national opioid litigation resolutions as a funding source raises questions about the sustainability of such financial support. Ensuring accountability in how funds are utilized will be crucial for the success of this bill.