Minnesota 2023-2024 Regular Session

Minnesota House Bill HF1272

Introduced
2/6/23  
Refer
2/6/23  
Refer
2/20/23  

Caption

Minimum crew size required for rail carriers, and penalties imposed.

Impact

Should HF1272 be enacted, it will directly amend existing statutes related to railroad operations in Minnesota. The proposed regulations will introduce specific penalties for violations of the crew size requirements, with fines ranging from $250 to $10,000 depending on the number of offenses. This measure seeks to bring Minnesota's regulations in line with safety practices that are increasingly seen as necessary in the rail industry to prevent accidents and ensure public safety. By clarifying requirements for railroad operators, the bill also aims to promote more reliable freight transport services, reflecting a proactive approach to safety in transportation law.

Summary

House File 1272 proposes a legislative measure concerning minimum crew sizes for rail carriers operating within the state of Minnesota. The bill mandates that a Class I or II railroad, or any railroad in a shared corridor, must employ a minimum crew of two individuals for the operation of trains or light engines moving freight. It highlights the importance of maintaining adequate staffing levels to ensure operational safety, particularly in shared corridors where light rail operates alongside freight services. The bill aims to enhance safety standards while simultaneously addressing potential hazards associated with reduced staffing during train operations.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding HF1272 appears to be supportive among legislators who prioritize safety within the transportation sector. Advocates argue that enforcing a minimum crew size is crucial for preventing accidents and ensuring the safe transport of goods. However, there may be disagreements among industry stakeholders, particularly those concerned about the potential impact on operational costs. While safety proponents view the bill as a vital step, some rail carriers might express concern over the implications of added financial penalties and operational constraints.

Contention

Potential points of contention related to HF1272 include the discussions surrounding the financial implications for rail carriers and their capacity to comply with the new regulations. Opponents may argue that such mandates could lead to increased operational costs, thereby impacting the competitiveness of the rail industry. Additionally, some might raise concerns about the feasibility of maintaining such crew sizes, especially in regions experiencing labor shortages. The debate could bring forth a broader discussion on balancing operational efficiency with safety, making this bill not just about immediately applicable crew sizes, but about the future direction of railroad regulations in Minnesota.

Companion Bills

MN SF1417

Similar To Minimum crew size requirement for certain rail carriers

Previously Filed As

MN SF1417

Minimum crew size requirement for certain rail carriers

MN HB1126

In railroads, providing for crew requirement; and imposing penalties.

MN HB540

In railroads, providing for crew requirement; and imposing penalties.

MN HF3896

Insurance coverage requirements increased for motor carriers of railroad employees, and civil penalties created.

MN SF4162

Motor carriers of railroad employees insurance coverage increase requirements and civil penalties created

MN SB779

Railroad safety; minimum train crew used in movement of freight, civil penalties.

MN HF3499

Railroad safety provided, including minimum insurance requirement modification and maximum train length establishment.

MN HB3662

Relating to railroad crew size requirements; imposing a civil penalty.

MN HB742

Relating to railroad crew size requirements; imposing a civil penalty.

MN HB1596

Relating to railroad crew size requirements; imposing a civil penalty.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.