Maryland House Bill HB1206

Maryland 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/10/23
• Refer: 2/10/23

Caption

Health - Automatic External Defibrillator, First Aid, and CPR - Requirements for Entertainment Venues

Impact

By mandating the presence of AEDs and trained staff, HB1206 is expected to enhance the emergency preparedness of entertainment venues across the state. The bill not only sets standards for health and safety at these establishments but also aligns with broader public health goals to increase survivability in cases of cardiac incidents. Furthermore, it provides immunity from civil liability for employees engaging in the use or non-use of AEDs, thereby encouraging participation without the fear of legal repercussions. This immunity aspect is likely to mitigate concerns about liability that venues may have regarding emergency medical situations.

Summary

House Bill 1206 establishes new regulations concerning the availability and use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) at entertainment venues such as cinemas, theaters, amphitheaters, concert halls, and sports stadiums. The bill mandates that each venue must obtain a certificate to operate and ensure that an AED is accessible on the premises. Furthermore, venues are required to have at least one employee present who is trained and certified in first aid and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). This initiative aims to improve the safety of patrons by ensuring that necessary emergency equipment and trained personnel are readily available in case of medical emergencies.

Conclusion

Overall, House Bill 1206 reflects a growing recognition of the importance of preparedness in public spaces. As it moves forward, it will be crucial to balance the need for public safety against the operational constraints that smaller businesses face, ensuring that all venues can adequately comply without compromising their financial viability.

Contention

While proponents of HB1206 argue that these regulations will protect patrons and potentially save lives, there may be concerns regarding the financial burden on smaller venues that might struggle to comply with the new requirements. Opponents could voice worries that the law may disproportionately affect smaller entertainment venues, which may lack the resources to fund the cost of AEDs and training. Furthermore, there could be debates over whether existing emergency response systems in place are sufficient, questioning the necessity for such mandates.