Maryland 2023 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB1084

Introduced
2/10/23  
Refer
2/10/23  
Report Pass
3/16/23  
Engrossed
3/18/23  
Refer
3/20/23  
Report Pass
4/4/23  
Enrolled
4/6/23  
Chaptered
5/16/23  

Caption

Natural Resources - Oyster Inspection and Severance Taxes - Increase

Impact

If enacted, the bill would change existing financial obligations for those involved in the oyster market by increasing the costs associated with transporting and harvesting oysters. It identifies the allocation of tax revenues, stipulating that the collected funds will support the Fisheries Research and Development Fund. Notably, the revision also alters the previous requirement that a portion of tax increases must be directed to the oyster seed program, thus offering greater flexibility in resource allocation for local oyster committees, although it could lead to skepticism regarding local priorities.

Summary

House Bill 1084 is legislation focused on the management and taxation of oysters in Maryland. Specifically, the bill aims to increase the inspection tax on marketable oysters shipped out of the state, raising it from 30 cents to $1 per bushel. Additionally, it proposes to double the severance tax on oysters caught within certain natural oyster bars from $1 to $2 per bushel. The aim of these tax adjustments is to bolster the state's financial support for programs dedicated to the repletion of natural oyster bars, which are crucial for maintaining ecological balance and supporting local fisheries.

Sentiment

General sentiment around HB 1084 appears to lean towards the positive, particularly among environmental advocates and local fisheries who emphasize the importance of sustaining oyster populations. However, some concerns may arise from those within the fishing community who could be affected by increased taxes, fearing it could impact their profitability. The discussions highlight a common theme in environmental legislation: balancing ecological needs with economic impact.

Contention

A notable point of contention among stakeholders relates to the amendment allowing flexibility in how tax increases are utilized, which could lead to diverse interpretations of spending priorities. Critics may argue that relaxing the stipulation on oyster seed program funding could diminish resources available for sustainability efforts, whereas supporters of the bill may contend that it allows for better resource allocation and more effective management of oyster populations across different counties.

Companion Bills

MD SB634

Crossfiled Natural Resources - Oyster Inspection and Severance Taxes - Increase

Previously Filed As

MD SB634

Natural Resources - Oyster Inspection and Severance Taxes - Increase

MD HB1217

Natural Resources - Oyster Inspection and Severance Taxes - Increase

MD HB1228

Natural Resources – Oysters – Spat, Shells, and Substrate

MD SB830

Natural Resources – Oysters – Spat, Shells, and Substrate

MD HB143

Somerset County - Natural Resources - Sunday Hunting

MD HB514

Charles County - Natural Resources - Sunday Hunting

MD HB556

Caroline County, Dorchester County, and Queen Anne's County - Natural Resources - Sunday Hunting

MD SB98

Somerset County - Natural Resources - Sunday Hunting

MD SB342

Caroline County and Queen Anne's County - Natural Resources - Sunday Hunting

MD SB388

Charles County - Natural Resources - Sunday Hunting

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.